Rebranding Feminism? Geethika Jayatilaka’s talk

Geethika Jayatilaka, Head of Policy and Parliamentary Affairs at the Fawcett Society, spoke at the Rebranding Feminism evening held at the ICA on 30th November. She's kindly allowed The F-Word to reproduce the text of her talk here.

, 16 December 2001

If Juliet has proposed the ‘cure’ then I want to take a step back and think

about the diagnosis: why do we need to repackage feminism and where does this

take us.

My starting point is based on working at Fawcett which is a membership

organisation and part of what we do is to sell feminism and a certain model of

activism. What we find is that there is a difficulty in engaging a wide

audience in the traditional forms of both these products.

What is interesting is that we are constantly told that once upon a time

feminism was radical, exciting, revolutionary and liberating; it inspired women

to march to protest and the world stopped and took notice and we are asked –

what has happened? What is wrong with young women today?

there are young women who call themselves

feminists

The problem with nostalgia for the glory days of the 60s and 70s is that it

blinds us to two important facts that there are young women who call themselves

feminists who are running organisations, setting up websites and organising

action and it also blinds us to the work that needs to be done to connect to

those who in large numbers reject feminism but embrace wholeheartedly the

equality agenda. And these issues are two sides of the same coin.

Young women believe in the values of feminism but many can’t or won’t or

don’t identify with the feminist movement. Why?

It isn’t that we believe the myth that we have it all. Most of us see, hear

or experience ourselves the inequality which still exists. Despite the talk of

girl power many young women don’t feel comfortable saying no to sex, or

negotiating safe sex and anorexia and self harm remains prevalent amongst young

women.

But instead of being seen as a way of empowering ourselves feminism seems to

be an additional burden, the equivalent of an ideological private members club

with an oppressively long list of criteria in order to be allowed in.

every aspect of a

woman’s life was scrutinised

This is not a new phenomenon – Julie Bindel in her contribution to Natasha

Walter’s collection On the Move: Feminism for a New Generation talks

about a subculture amongst radical feminists which meant every aspect of a

woman’s life was scrutinised in order to determine whether you were a good

feminist or not, including the music you listened to and the clothes you wore.

She goes on to describe how this has changed – but it has not changed enough and

it is this over policing of individual behaviour that is rejected by young women

today.

We need think how we can expose the pressures on young women today without

attacking individual women and without denying women the pleasure they find in

clothes or in their relationships.

Does wearing hairclips or hello kitty rucksacks represent the infantilisation

of women or is it part of a wider trend amongst 20 and 30 somethings to

celebrate our youth for longer? The Girlie subculture in the US is about

celebrating the feminine, about highlighting that to be feminist is not to not

be feminine and that to be equal does not mean to be the same. The old rules

don’t always apply and we need to accept that this is ok.

The rejection of the old style “personal is political” is coupled with a

rejection of the traditional political altogether. We had the lowest voter

turnout in 2001 and in particular low numbers among young women. There is a

wider disengagement with politics and policy and our ability to influence it

which means we have to rethink how women can connect with the ways in which

change is made.

The victories of the 2nd wavers, legislation on equal pay and sex

discrimination the acceptance of words like chauvinist created a new culture and

changed the society we live in.

To borrow a phrase, today feminism is like fluoride – we scarcely notice we

have it – it is simply in the water. Issues like childcare, domestic violence

and contraception are on the agenda even if not exactly in the ways we would

like, and there are campaigning groups for just about every cause imaginable.

Feminism and activism have changed as a result.

Whilst once, feminist activism enabled us to celebrate with our sisters and

without the need to be part of a couple or with a man. Now no-one bats an eyelid

at a group of girls in a bar or women only gyms, and the other day an all women

line up of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? to counter under

representation of women in the show passed without much comment.

We may not always need activism in the same forms we used to. In fact

many young women don’t even know what constitutes activism (it is the 2nd most

faq on the “Ask Amy” advice facility at the feminist.com website)

So how do we “do” our feminism today?

young women who live

their feminism in their everyday lives but have an ambivalence to the movement

as a whole

Kathy Bail coined the term DIY feminism to talk about young women who live

their feminism in their everyday lives but have an ambivalence to the movement

as a whole. The women she interviewed for her book were committed to redefining

feminism in their own way, building on women’s past achievements but also

developing a much more contemporary style and attitudes. Their main concern was

the right result – it didn’t matter whether it was backed by academic study,

theoretical correctness or party politics.

The concept of DIY feminism is about marketing feminism in a way which will

appeal to young women and is a way of reconnecting the experiences of women to

the movement for change.

Feminism has to stop being seen purely as an intellectual pursuit for the

educated elite and has to start being about real women and real lives.

We need a way of reminding women that when they dance to the song

Independent Woman or start a network of women within their office or

their field of work or even in the words of Bridget Jones share a “rant” with

their friends that this is all part of activism in action.

The DIY idea doesn’t preclude the need for collective action or detract from

the need to revitalise the feminist movement. In fact to me it really reaffirms

the importance of it. The concept of exercising your feminism and activism in

your own life by challenging sexist jokes, by breaking barriers and smashing

glass ceilings is for many women a luxury.

To those in the lowest paid jobs, for whom challenge would mean sacking, for

the woman whose partner is violent towards her, individual action is not the

answer.

We need collective action for the reasons we always have done – to effect

change for the people who need it the most. But in order to be effective we need

to be able to broaden our appeal and to reach a new generation and to show that

the personal is political is liberating and not oppressing and we who call

ourselves feminists have to grapple with that.

If you think Generation X need

the hard sell then wait for generation Y

And this is an issue which will not go away – If you think Generation X need

the hard sell then wait for generation Y – the tweenies, the phenomenon which

have marketing departments rubbing their hands with glee, the big spending,

media savvy, technologically skilled, most materialistic generation yet. They

are used to being “sold” an idea, of being convinced and will expect no less

from us.

But they were also the generation who grew up with girl power! And there is a

lesson to be learnt here – whatever you think about the Spice Girls, they

showed that feminism could be repackaged and sold. Instead of looking down our

noses at this phenomenon we need to think about how to harness and use it.

Yes girl power has failed if the extent of that power is to go and buy a set

of dolls or to wear platform shoes – but it hasn’t if it enables young women to

begin to think about their experiences and see them in a wider context and to

begin to challenge inequalities in a safe environment.

So if you ask what’s wrong with young women today the answer is there’s

nothing wrong we are simply doing feminism in a different way to our

foremothers.

We are not younger versions of the women who marched in the 60s and 70s

because our conceptions of feminism and equality are shaped by our different

experiences and lives. And it is vital we are recognised as such if we are to be

successful in showing a new generation the importance of fitting their

experiences in to a feminist framework.

After all one possible postscript to the phrase “I’m not a feminist but” is I

might be if I was recognised as one by others.

Have Your say

Comments are closed on this post

Categories

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds