Daily Mail solicits fuel for racist immigration stories
By Jess McCabe | 19 February 2008, 11:54
A leaked email from a Daily Mail features writer is doing the rounds. It demonstrates the newspaper’s xenophobic agenda perfectly:
——-Original Message——- From: rsreply@dwpub.com [mailto:rsreply@dwpub.com] Sent: 13 February 2008 15:57 To:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Response Source - Diana Appleyard , Daily Mail (Request for personal case study)PUBLICATION: Daily Mail (Request for personal case study)
JOURNALIST: Diana Appleyard (staff)
DEADLINE: 14-February-2008 16:00
QUERY: I am urgently looking for anonymous horror stories of people who have employed Eastern European staff, only for them to steal from them, disappear, or have lied about their resident status. We can pay you £100 for taking part, and I promise it will be anonymous, just a quick phone call. Could you email me asap? Many thanks, DianaHOW TO REPLY:
Email: mailto:dianaappleyard@aol.com
Phone: not provided for use
Fax: 01296 738083 (preferred)
(Via Labourhome and Liberal Conspiracy)
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.
Feeds
Cara said:
I vote we send in some spoof responses ;-)
Posted on 19 February 2008 at 3:57 PM
Christina said:
Replied!
"Your desperate plea for 'anonymous horror stories' on Eastern Europeans gave me a good five minute chuckle today, by showing the Daily Mail as the xenophobic rag it really is. I only hope that at some point your conscience kicks in with a shred of guilt over the despicable hate peddling that earns your keep."
Though I imagine her inbox is groaning under the weight of e-mails a bit more vitriolic than that. I won't hold my breath for a reply.
Posted on 19 February 2008 at 6:04 PM
Evie said:
Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail and self-appointed guardian of the Morals of Middle England has a line in the c word that would cause a shipful of sailors to blush. He stomps into the office shouting and screaming at staff: "You f**ing c***" or for a change "You useless c***" The beleagured staff members of the Mail are now used to these foul mouthed tirades, and refer to them as 'Paul's Vagina Monologues'.
Posted on 19 February 2008 at 6:17 PM
Clare said:
No don't send in spoof responses! They would just print them as fact...
Posted on 25 February 2008 at 12:04 AM
Northern Jess said:
I am commenting on this because it is the first Daily Mail related post I could find. On 31 May fans of the band My Chemical Romance are planning a march on the Daily Mail in protest of the papers reactionary and untrue portreyal of the band promoting suicide in young people. Not that I want to hijack someone else's protest, but surely this is a great oppertunity to protest the DM's attitude in general? I'm gonna go to protest reactionary unfounded journalism, this email is another reason to protest, anyone want to join me?
Posted on 22 May 2008 at 3:27 PM
Anna said:
I do feel like the Mail might have a point on that one - if I listened to MCR I'd want to kill myself.
Posted on 22 May 2008 at 4:12 PM
Joachim said:
it seems that the freedom of speech in this country is a little too uncontrolled. As papers caters to the mass pupulation they should be more filtered. Freedom of speech is one thing, persecussion is another
Posted on 08 July 2009 at 9:51 AM