Positive Discrimination Debate
By Holly Combe | 21 March 2008, 20:56
When it comes to the question of positive discrimination, I tend to err towards a similar view to the one that Lib Dem MP Jackie Ballard expressed a few years back: it doesn’t sit well with me but in the face of persistent inequality, fuelled by people’s prejudices, I believe it could become necessary as a short-time option. In my view, it’s one thing to be concerned about it because it is, by definition, a form of discrimination and quite another to be concerned because, really, you’re afraid of the old privileges being toppled. I’d argue that, for a lot of people, it’s the latter. One only needs to see how upset some people get when a mere recruitment drive to attract under-represented groups in a profession takes place to see that.
Currently, positive discrimination is illegal. The issue of whether it might actually be called for was the topic of a debate I briefly took part in, along with Simon Woolley of Operation Black Vote and Personnel Today’s Tony Pettengell, on the Richard Bacon show last Tuesday. You can still listen to this discussion on-line until later on 25 March.
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.
Feeds
Liz Ely said:
I agree, I think that positive discrimination is a horrible term which doesn't represent what it is. I think the US affirmitive action seems to make more sense. To me it's like yeah, in a world of equal opportunities it would not be necessary but as it is it's like starting athletes at different places round a track to make it fairer for the ones that have already had further to run.
Posted on 21 March 2008 at 10:25 PM
David Space said:
I gather both main political parties in Spain are planning to introduce gender-based taxation that will tax men 2% more than women on the same earnings. That makes the kind of positive discrimination we're contemplating in the UK look pretty feeble!
Posted on 28 March 2008 at 1:34 AM