Doctor Who and Catherine Tate

So Doctor Who starts again on Saturday, yippee! And the Doctor’s new companion will be Catherine Tate.

Now, like many other people when I first heard the news Tate would be in this series I have to admit I really wasn’t sure about it at all. In fact I did register my disgust, in the really ineffective way many people seem to do these days, by signing up to a Facebook group, this one called Get Martha Jones Back in the Tardis!.

But I was thinking yesterday: won’t it be refreshing to have a female character in Doctor Who who is a little bit older for a change? Tate is 39 - not exactly ancient obviously - but certainly a different generation from Rose (Billie Piper, 25) and Martha (Freema Agyeman, 29).

I think its a good thing to have a female character who’s a bit older (whether her character will be a good one remains to be seen). But without being an expert on the Doctor’s past “companions” (which the more I think about it seems a little bit of a creepy word to use), it seems unusual to break the mould of older Doctor, young female assistant (does anyone more geeky than me have any stats on this?).

So really, this is just to say - yay for an older woman in the Tardis for a change.

Posted by Catherine Redfern on 2 April 2008, at 11:02 PM | Comments (20)

Your Comments

Alex Corwin said:

I'm not much of a Dr Who fan (I watch it occasionally, but I can live without it too), but I was thinking awhile ago isn't time there was a female Dr.?

I mean really, if the Dr. can come back from the dead (or what ever it is he does... as I said I don't watch that much), surely he could come back as a she? Or would that be far more scary then all the daleks put together!

Posted on 02 April 2008 at 11:47 PM

Sarah said:

Interesting - mind you, the first doctor's two companions were Teachers Ian Chesterton and Barbara Wright. I don't know how old the actress who played Barbara was, but she struck me as being competent. Towards the end of her time in the show, I believe she was taking on a more protective role towards the Doctor...

I look forward to a companion who doesn't fall in love with the doctor! ;-)

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 12:10 AM

Daege said:

I'm looking forward to Tate as the new companion; I've never had anything against her. And it is brilliant to have someone older. As much as I love Martha and Rose, I've been thinking that young, London females have been getting a bit repetitive in the show. So Donna is still a London female, but at least she's a little older!

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 12:46 AM

Julie said:

Ahha!
As a feminist Doctor Who geek, I can confirm that although many of the 'classic' series companions were male, almost all of the females were young, thin and attractive. Usually, their main purpose on the show was to provide an excuse for exposition by constantly asking the Doctor questions, and so their lines were limited to "what is it, Doctor?" or "Aaahhhhh!".

There is no reason that I know of why the doctor cannot be regenerated as a woman, except that it has never happened before. The Doctor and Master have always been male on the show, and Ramana was female during both incarnations.

It is very clear to me that opposition to Catherine Tate is based on the assumption that his assistants should be young and super-attractive. To get the dads watching. Or something.

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 2:43 AM

schneewittchen said:

I think that David Tennant is so perfect as the Doctor, best one ever, but, I totally agree that it's time for a female doc and when David goes, let's have a woman in the role. I LOVED Captain Janeway in Voyager, a woman in charge who didn't have to be a fake man.
I also loved Martha Jones as the Doctor's sidekick, but I agree that Catherine Tate is great too, in several ways. Yes, she's older, she's also not the usual physical type AND, while both Rose and Martha were quite sassy, Catherine's character is curmudgeonly. Perfect!

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 6:05 AM

Leigh Woosey said:

The objection to Catherine Tate and her character 'Donna' is ostensibly based on the fact that her character was pushy, unhelpful and a little shrill in her fist outing- the 2006 Christmas special. This is complicated by the fact that a younger companion who can ask questions and not feel so foolish is used as a substitute for the viewer who also has a lot of questions about the plot and setting. However, I share Julie's suspicion that the underlying objection is based on the male scopophiliac urge- It is perceived as unnatural to have an equally mature female paired with an adult male and fans simply don't want to look at that or confront their own assumptions. If anybody is feeling like a good read Naomi Wolf's 'The Beauty Myth' has a good chapter on this and how it applies to the presentation of American news readers (try the F-Word Amazon shop or a local library). This essay shows what a perennial problem the depiction of women in Science Fiction is.

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 9:59 AM

orlando said:

I remember the actor who played Leela in the Tom Baker era (who was actually ex-RSC so, one would assume, capable of quite a performance range) commenting that "There's only so many ways you can say 'what is it, Doctor?'"

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 11:36 AM

Betsy said:

Older woman, great, but she asks stupid questions all the time. Unlike Martha (a doctor), or Rose (who had more than the usual amount of common sense it seemed), Donna just seems stupid (maybe I'm being harsh). Replacing young intelligent women with a stupid older woman doesn't seem to be much progress to me.

Also Catherine Tate really annoys me.

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 12:57 PM

Juliet said:

Maybe Catherine Tate could play her 'Nan' character as the doctor's sidekick, and keep saying 'who is it?' and 'whaaaat a fucking liberty!' Or 'don't take no notice of 'im, love, he ain't got a job'.

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 1:56 PM

Seph said:

I wouldn't care wether the Doctor had an older or younger female companion if he didn't have one that was a whiny idiot (like Tate's looking to be) or little miss "LETS GO SAVE THE PUPPIES COS IM SWEET AND INNOCENT!111" (Rose)
Didn't catch much of the Martha series but she looked half-decent. A female Doctor might be interesting, but I have a bad feeling she'd end up turning into Yuna from FFX.

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 6:50 PM

Anna said:

I've nothing in the slightest against the Doctor having an older female companion.. but Catherine Tate really, really gets on my tits. Maybe she'll prove me wrong, I don't know. We'll see!

Posted on 03 April 2008 at 8:03 PM

Burrow said:

While the idea of an older female companion is one that is really wonderful to me, but I really, really hated Donna and am dreading a season of her. Perhaps they'll prove me wrong, since I doubt they can make the season watchable if Donna continues to behave in exactly the same way she did last xmas.

I like that she questions and challenges the Doctor, but then again, Martha did and in a less annoying way. *shrug* guess we'll find out.

Posted on 04 April 2008 at 4:22 AM

Jo said:

Yaaaay Doctor Who!!

I quite liked Donna in the Christmas special even if the episode itself was a bit rubbish. I think she'll be a good companion. I agree it's great to have an older companion AND especially one who doesn't fancy the Doctor for a change. (In fairness to the old series, most of the female companions weren't love interests even if their roles were otherwise pretty limited. It's mostly the new series that's hyped up the sexual tension. The fact that David Tennant is quite pretty probably contributes to it.)

I've actually had the conversation about Tate at work with the guy who sits next to me, and he said straight up that he doesn't think she'll be a good companion because she's not "fit" like the other two. Tuh. ;) I pointed out that he's not attracted to the Doctor yet is perfectly content to watch him. I don't think it had any effect.

Posted on 04 April 2008 at 11:42 AM

Li said:

I think the older female companion idea is great, but seriously, Donna? When I heard I was appalled. Especially as Martha was so awesome! I was like "we've only had one season of Martha, come on, we need at least 50 (yes, fifty!) more". Yeah, I just joined that Facebook group.

But then I think the Doctor should be David Tennant and the companion should be Freema Agyeman forever and ever and ever and ever and although I'd love a female Doctor (and fantasise about it being me), that would involve the Doctor not being David Tennant anymore and that would be bad.

I'm a little obsessed, I know.

Posted on 04 April 2008 at 8:40 PM

Jonathan Bryant said:

Oh please...

"The objection to Catherine Tate and her character 'Donna' is ostensibly based on the fact that her character was pushy, unhelpful and a little shrill in her fist (sic) outing".

I think you'll find the objection to Catherine Tate is ostensibly based on the fact that she can't act - which is why she has to keeping slipping into Lauren from her comedy show.

She's just wrong for the part (in much the same way that Trigger was wrong for lord of the cybermen).

Posted on 13 April 2008 at 9:55 AM

Serian said:

I'm completely unqualified on this note, watching Dr Who only when I remember but personally I think Catherine Tate is brilliant.

Judging by the most recent episode (the only one of this series that I've seen) she's wonderful. Older, and (unlike the other 2) she's not completely skinny and that's great. Having maddeningly big boobs, it's really nice to see natural big boobs on TV.

And on a more important note, she doesn't seem brainless. Most of the episode showed her showing him things he'd never seen before (the whole Celtic/Latin thing) and her relieving his guilt.

Posted on 13 April 2008 at 6:51 PM

dialecto said:

"It is very clear to me that opposition to Catherine Tate is based on the assumption that his assistants should be young and super-attractive."

Well, good for you, that that's so clear to you. There is, of course, also the possibility that one could dislike Catherine Tate on the grounds that she is an even worse actress than she ever was a comic (and that's really saying something) and just downright one of the most annoying people on television today. As a result, there is absolutely no chemistry (and no, I do not mean physical - I can very well do without that) between Donna and the Doctor. I would take a well-written, well-performed female 11th doctor any day (mind you, I really do like Tenant for the role, too) and/or a male or even multiple companions. I just downright despise Catherine Tate.

Posted on 15 April 2008 at 7:44 PM

dialecto said:

Here's a thought: If everyone seems to be so hung-up on the supposed 'ageism' of the recent series, and is calling for an older female companion, the producers could have simply asked Elisabeth Sladen to re-join the Doctor as Sarah Jane Smith full-time. I would have loved that move. But Catherine Tate is simply unwatchable.

Posted on 15 April 2008 at 11:47 PM

Ken said:

An American male just coming up to speed on Catherine Tate. Wow...

Anyone who says she isn't a good comedian or actor is grinding their own axe inside their own head. I haven't laughed more or felt a more 'human' multidimensional pairing between the doctor and an 'assistant/companion' in years. She also gets to the doctor in unpredictable ways. I hope this partnership goes on for a while...

Posted on 29 April 2008 at 8:07 PM

Lemon Girl said:

Can i just say- and i realise that this discussion is probably long forgotten- donna noble is a fantastic companion who is most definitely the best of the three in the new series. She strikes a blow for women everywhere, I think, and it's so refreshing to see a companion who doesn't take what the doctor has to say lying down- she isn't standing for any of his nonsense! I hope no one who has watched the series now thinks catherine is a bad actor because she's clearly very skilled; I too was annoyed when I heard of her casting and now I love her to bits. She will be missed, especially with her heartbreaking goodbye.

Posted on 20 August 2008 at 12:16 AM

Have your say

In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.

  1. This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
  2. All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
  3. No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
  4. Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
  5. No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
  6. Be nice.

Please note that your email address will not be displayed on this website. All comments are checked, prior to being published on this site.

< back | top ^ | next >

Latest Posts
Appropriate games for girls
Sheffield anti-violence demo this Saturday
Reclaim The Night London
Muslimah Media Watch
Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
68th Carnival of Feminists, and some thoughts on waves
New Cardiff Feminist Group
OK I eat my hat....
And in other news
News Round Up - ridiculous ideas of the day
More posts
Latest Comments
Lew on New Cardiff Feminist Group
Siany on And in other news
sarahcl on More news and views
Anna on Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
Kathy on Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
ethnic midget on Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
Caroline on Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
Renee on News Round Up - ridiculous ideas of the day
Renee on Time wasting tool of the day: GenderAnalyzer
Lynne Miles on RIP Amy Leigh Barnes and Duanna Johnson
More feminist bloggers
There are plenty of fantastic UK feminist bloggers around. For a fantastic introduction to feminist blogging, go to the Carnival of Feminists website, which showcases the finest feminist posts from around the blogsphere, including many from UK blogs.
Small Print
All blog posts are the views of the individual post author, and not those of The F-Word.

Inside this section

Blog Home
Archives by Month
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
More Archives
Archives by Author
Abby O'Reilly
Anne Onne
Barbara Felix
Carrie Dunn
Catherine Redfern
Guest Blogger
Helen G
Holly Combe
Jess McCabe
Kate Smurthwaite
Laura Woodhouse
Louise Livesey
Lynne Miles
Milly Shaw
Samara Ginsberg
Sokari Ekine
Yvonne Howard
zohra moosa
News prior to April 2005
XML feed Feeds
Latest Blog Posts
Latest Comments

Contact Us

This webpage lives at: http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2008/04/doctor_who_and