Women Warriors, not in Woolworths...
by Barbara Felix // 26 April 2008, 17:04
There is an interesting short piece in The Economist concerning atlatlists, that is, spear throwing. Atlatl is an Aztec word, which refers not to the spear itself, but to the device used to throw it. Said device is apparently
"a carefully shaped stick just under a metre long which acts as an extension of the human throwers arm. The spear is balanced along it, with the blunt end snug against the hook. The other end is held by the hurler. The atlatl serves to amplify the hurlers arm movement in a way that allows a stone-tipped spear to be propelled at speeds well over 150kph."
This is important, it is being argued, because it may have played "an important part in human evolution" that is to say, it was a social equaliser, allowing "dextrous women and children" to use a spear "as well as muscular men." This is worth thinking about in a war situation, the report suggests, because a woman who could hurl a spear "particularly in hunter-gatherer societies" where war is often "a hunt with women as the prize" would have a significant advantage. The atlatl, concludes the report, would therefore be "one of the first great assertions of feminism."
Have Your say
To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word, or login using Facebook or Twitter. Not a member? Register

Founder of The F-Word, Catherine Redfern, has co-authored a new book with Kristin Aune. Find out more at the
Molly // Posted 28 April 2008 at 23:12
And if Jean Auel is to be believed, it was invented by the same prehistoric woman who brought us the sewing needle, domesticated animals, flint firestarters, and about a dozen other things I can't dig out of my brain. (She was, of course, not only white but blonde, blue-eyed, stacked, and thin. Why did I keep reading those damned books?!)
Leigh Woosey // Posted 29 April 2008 at 21:57
The title of this post reminds me of this photo, which I took while shopping for toys after Christmas at my local Woolies. Girls coats: bright pink. Boys coats...blue? No. Military camouflage. Boys are not only expected not to wear pink but but to wear something aggressive and militaristic. The dichotomy appals, but is so ubiquitous.