And while we’re on the topic….

there comes news of this case from the US in which a woman fought off a sexual assault assailant, only to be punished by a crowd of laughing men with a second sexual assault. Melissa Bruen was walking home during spring break along a path known as “The Rape Trail” because it leads to off-campus accommodation for University of Connecticut where big parties happen. Whilst talking on the phone to a friend, Bruen was dragged to her feet, pinned against a telephone pole and “dry humped” by an unknown assailant. Bruen fought back despite her assailant’s jeers that she was just being “feisty” - she managed to pin him to the ground and punch him in the face and stomach. A crowd of men had gathered by this point (not one of them trying to stop the crime in front of her) and when her assailant broke free and ran off complaining she had attacked him the crime got even worse.

Bruen reported to the crowd that he had just sexually assaulted her to which one man replied “You think that was assault?”. He then pulled down her top and forcibly grabbed her breasts. The crowd yelled in pleasure completely ignoring that Bruen was being sexually assault seemingly for their viewing pleasure. Bruen reported the attacks to the Police but the crowds made it impossible for Police to single out her attacker(s) (mind they could just have arrested them all - I’m with Jackie Fleming on this, if men can’t be trusted out at night, don’t let them onto the streets).

Feministing and Shakespeares Sister have already done good analyses to which I have little new stuff to add.
1. Bruen did everything right and was punished for it making clear that women asserting themselves and denying men’s “rights” of access to their bodies often ends up with their suffering even more.
2. The statistics we have on the prevalence of sexual assault hide the fact that often women are victims of multiple attacks over their lifetime - so yes 1 in 5 women might experience sexual violence in their lifetime but how many times is the real question. Sexual violence generally isn’t a “once in a lifetime” experience - it’s repeated by the same and by different perpetrators over women’s lifecourses.
3. It’s not just the assailants to blame in this, the crowd jeered them on. And they will, in all liklihood, go unpunished because they could sink back into the crowd of men for protection.
4. Whether we face up to it or not, sexual violence is still seen as sexy. Think about the Vegas story earlier this week, think about this one, then tell me they aren’t essentially about the same thing - male power and the presumption of women’s silence and obedience.

Your Comments

Mary Tracy9 said:

This is the result of the proliferation of pornography, which has made it not only acceptable but "sexxaay" to gang rape or, in this case, gang assault. The message is that this is what women want and this is what women are there for. And there's no one challenging these views.

Posted on 08 May 2008 at 1:40 PM

JENNIFER DREW said:

Not only the mainstreaming of pornography but also the never-ending sexualisation of women and girls which is one of the main reasons why this group of male rapists (yes they are rapists because they either colluded or committed the sexual assault) believe it is their right and entitlement to rape, sexually exploit and sexually assault any woman they see as 'rapeable.'

Of course the excusers will be out in force claiming this young woman caused these men to sexually assault her because of the way she was dresssed etc. etc. Or it is the fault of feminism because feminists want women to be equal with men and this is what happens when women do not have their 24/7 male master watching their every move. But once again we must look at the men's behaviour and attitude because not one male stepped in to help this young woman and this appalling display of male sexual arrogance, contempt and hatred for women speaks volumes in respect of how low women's value has now become societally. Women apparently are sexualised commodities for men's entertainment.

Posted on 08 May 2008 at 4:28 PM

Have your say

In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.

  1. This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
  2. All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
  3. No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
  4. Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
  5. No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
  6. Be nice.

Please note that your email address will not be displayed on this website. All comments are checked, prior to being published on this site.

< back | top ^ | next >

Latest Posts
Southall Black Sisters boycott London committee hearing on violence against women over BNP presence
Round-up!
Internship Opportunities at Refuge
Game competition about domestic violence
40% of ethnic minority women in UK live in poverty - Fawcett
New Women's History Magazine - HerStoria
Excuse me while I have a little rant...
Most conventionally-attractive female players scheduled for centre court, admits Wimbledon
Review: Germaine Greer: "not despondent...worried"
Off the beaten path
More posts
Latest Comments
polly styrene on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
Hannah on Internship Opportunities at Refuge
Laura Woodhouse on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
Jack Leland on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
Lucy on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
David Kames on Most conventionally-attractive female players scheduled for centre court, admits Wimbledon
Rebecca on Beware the "Look" Policy at Abercrombie & Fitch
Sarah on Internship Opportunities at Refuge
Rosa on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
Karen on Excuse me while I have a little rant...
More feminist bloggers
There are plenty of fantastic UK feminist bloggers around. For a fantastic introduction to feminist blogging, go to the Carnival of Feminists website, which showcases the finest feminist posts from around the blogsphere, including many from UK blogs.
How to contribute to The F-Word
Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info
Events
Check out our events listings for info on some of the fantastic feminist events going on up and down the country. Please get in touch to tell us about events we've not listed yet.
Small Print
All blog posts are the views of the individual post author, and not those of The F-Word.

Inside this section

Blog Home
Archives by Month
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
More Archives
Archives by Author
Abby O'Reilly
Anne Onne
Barbara Felix
Bill Savage
Carrie Dunn
Catherine Redfern
Guest Blogger
Helen G
Holly Combe
Jess McCabe
Kate Smurthwaite
Kit Roskelly
Laura Woodhouse
Louise Livesey
Lynne Miles
Milly Shaw
Samara Ginsberg
Sokari Ekine
Sunny Hundal
Suzi FemAcadem
Yvonne Howard
zohra moosa
News prior to April 2005
XML feed Feeds
Latest Blog Posts
Latest Comments

Contact Us

This webpage lives at: http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2008/05/and_while_were