Carol Ann Duffy’s “unconventional lifestyle”, by the Observer
So, Carol Ann Duffy’s “unconventional lifestyle” impeded her chances of becoming the first female Poet Laureate, according to The Observer.
By “unconventional lifestyle”, they mean she is a lesbian. And no, they weren’t quoting anyone, that’s their description. Yes, I did say Observer not Daily Mail. It actually gets worse. Because, we learn, Duffy’s lifestyle is now considered conventional enough that she might be in for a second chance of getting the gig, as she’s apparently not in a relationship (at least not with anyone high profile!) anymore:
While Armitage was ruled out because of his relative youth, Duffy’s unconventional lifestyle was said to have counted against her….
It was also suggested that Blair, then Prime Minister, had vetoed Duffy because he was concerned that her domestic arrangements would be inappropriate for such a public figure.
Now, as the gift of the position comes around again, things look different for Duffy. Her daughter, Ella, is almost a teenager and her relationship with her fellow Scottish poet, Jackie Kay, has ended. She has built on the success of her 1993 collection, Mean Time, which won both the Whitbread and Forward prizes, with an intense 2005 work, Rapture, which won the TS Eliot prize. Duffy, born in 1955, has also been appointed an OBE and a CBE and is now a regular feature of the GCSE syllabus.
Note: the implication doesn’t seem to be that attitudes have changed, but her relationship status has changed - presumably making her sexuality less visible?! As least to, um, people who’ve not read any of her poetry, and don’t know anything about her?!
(Incidentally, I was studying Duffy’s collected poems for my A Levels at around the time she was up for the Laureate job last time, so it’s not like she wasn’t on the syllabus in 1999.)
Posted by Jess McCabe on 18 May 2008, at 8:04 PM | Comments (7)
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.
Feeds
Redheadinred said:
I did CAD for my a-levels as well. I love her poetry, I tend to think the reason she isn't appreciated by a lot of people is that she is - a FEMINIST, and on top of that, not even a 'friendly feminist' because she doesn't even fancy men, so is percieved as some screwed-up dangerous person.
Posted on 18 May 2008 at 9:32 PM
Jess McCabe said:
She's certainly better than Simon bloody Armitage.
Posted on May 18, 2008 10:47 PM
shatterboxx said:
Didn't Carol Ann Duffy say she would have refused the award even if she had been offered it? God, that article is ridiculous though... Do the Observer even CARE how they look any more...
Posted on 18 May 2008 at 11:07 PM
Seph said:
This is just stupid, what the hell does being a lesbian have to do with your job.
Hell, half the male poets we studied in school were more famous for being alcoholics, abusive or insane than for their poetry and it never stopped some of them being made poet laureate.
Posted on 19 May 2008 at 3:35 AM
Jo said:
Thank Christ for the f-word!! I read that particular piece on Sunday and couldn't quite believe my eyes either. Shame on you, Observer.
Posted on 22 May 2008 at 10:02 AM
Steph Jones said:
Have just sent a contribution for the Review letters page. You may want to do the same? Address is: review@guardian.co.uk
Posted on 22 May 2008 at 10:17 AM
dc said:
Yes, I was equally outraged by their idiotic view that she was more "acceptable" now because she was no longer in a lesbian relationship.
So if she gets it, is she supposed to stay celibate for the next 10 years?!@##$%^ Or have a relationship with a man?
The whole idea is deeply offensive. I hope people have written into the f**king Observer to give them a bollocking.
Posted on 24 May 2008 at 4:04 AM