Emergency protest to defend 24-week limit TONIGHT
Just a quick reminder to London-based readers:
Get yourself down to Westminster from 5.30pm today, for the emergency protest outside Parliament, as MPs vote on crucial amendments to the Human Embryology and Fertilisation Bill which could curtail women’s right to access abortion.
Meet at Old Palace Yard, opposite St Stephen’s Entrance.
Some background from Abortion Rights:
On Tuesday 20 May Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the anti-abortion amendments to the Human Embryology and Fertilisation Bill. The key amendments aim to lower the time limit for abortion and must be defeated.This vote is taking place much earlier than expected and with very little notice. In the limited time available, it is vital that everyone who supports a woman’s right to choose does everything they can to show their opposition to any reduction in the time limit. Please attend this crucial protest - and encourage your trade union, women’s group, student union or other organization to send a presence. Please also write to your MP in advance of 20th to urge them to vote against any amendment to reduce the time limit. A model letter is available at www.abortionrights.org.uk
We say: women must come first. There is no significant scientific or medical support for any reduction in the time limit. Yet a handful of anti-abortionists are using downright propaganda and misinformation, hoping to intimidate and mislead MPs into attacking women’s rights. An overwhelming majority of the public supports the right to choose: MPs should uphold choice and vote down amendments by Nadine Dorries and any anti-abortion MPs.
Less than two per cent of abortions take place after 20 weeks. If successful, a lowering of the abortion time limit would be devastating for a small number of women in difficult, unforeseeable and individual circumstances and would encourage further anti-abortion attacks. Contrary to anti-abortion hype, research shows there has been no increase in survival rates for births under 24 weeks. There is opposition to any lowering of the time limit from the British Medical Association, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Royal College of Nursing, TUC and national trade unions, the Department of Health and MPs across all three major parliamentary political parties.
Photo by SarahDeer, shared under a Creative Commons license
Posted by Jess McCabe on 20 May 2008, at 10:14 AM | Comments (4)
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.


Anji said:
I might actually be able to make it, as Orion is at his daddy's overnight tonight. :D
Posted on 20 May 2008 at 12:29 PM
Jess McCabe said:
Excellent, maybe see you there then!
Posted on May 20, 2008 12:39 PM
Larla said:
There are no words for how much I would love to go to this. I feel passionate about it. Unfortunately, despite only being in Oxford, I don't have enough money to get there. How rubbish. I hope it goes brilliantly.
Posted on 20 May 2008 at 3:21 PM
Julie said:
I recieved a letter from my MP, Gavin Strang, this morning. He says that he isn't going to vote for anything which resticts access to abortion. I'm actually surprised how strongly he worded his letter - I had expected a wishy-washy politician's answer. This is one of those rare moments that I feel fairly represented.
Posted on 20 May 2008 at 6:48 PM