Jack Straw’s just noticed….
I’ve heard of oblivious but Jack Straw has seemingly only just noticed that our judges are overwhelming white and male. Now he claims he wants to do something about it. Perhaps that will take less time than the 20 years it’s taken to notice the problem in the first place.
Concerns about white, middle class men dominating the bench were justified, he told the Justice Select Committee. Mr Straw said he was determined to ensure that the judiciary represented wider society better. “The expectation that a new system would lead to a more diverse judiciary has so far not been fulfilled,” he said in evidence to the committee.
From BBC News
This comes after the not surprising news that there are now fewer female judges and few from minority ethnic populations than under the previous selection process. Women now constitute just 34% of judges and minority ethnic women judges are rarer than stardust.
Posted by Louise Livesey on 14 May 2008, at 9:23 AM | Comments (7)
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.
Feeds
Anne Onne said:
He might first want to work on a way to remove judges who are clearly incompetent, which would probably take care of quite a few of his white, male judges. I have no faith in a system where it is practically impossible to get rid of (I don't know the technical term for 'de-judge') a judge who repeatedly hands out crazy sentences or verdicts. I also have little faith in a system where we crow about how few rape convictions there are, but allow the defending side (aka accused rapists) to pick out a jury with 10 men and 2 women, show the victim's underwear in court, and judge any evidence that the victim ever consented to sex as meaning she can't have been raped. So, you know, this is a very small fix compared to all the other things wrong with the judicial system. But I hope it works.
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 9:38 AM
JENNIFER DREW said:
Feminists have been telling you this for years Jack but to date you refused to listen. I wonder why? Could it be election time is creeping ever closer and pseudo promises are now appearing in order to obtain women's vote. How about changing the system Jack so that misogynstic and blatantly biased judges can be removed from office. Because at present once appointed it is for life.
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 1:22 PM
Deborah said:
I agree, I think getting rid of the "judge for life" rubbish is essential. Most judges male and white but I'd like to know what the average age is.
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 3:02 PM
Shea said:
In absolute agreement with Jennifer Drew here. This has been a problem for 30+ years and now they are "choosing" to notice this? What about the number of male, white, middle class barristers, because thats where you get your judges from? Now Nulab are realising how little attention they have paid to equality and women's issues and how it is just about to turn around and bite them in the butt, so they wheel out phony promises in the hope we will vote for them. I DONT THINK SO!
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 3:07 PM
Rachel said:
Furthermore, the majority of those women judges sit very low down in the court system, so they never get to judge in the more important, precedent setting cases. Ever heard of a female House of Lords member? no me niether....
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 3:07 PM
Nina said:
I am a little confused by this, was Jack Straw specifically meant to have demonstrated that he'd noticed this before in some way?
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 3:37 PM
Kuja said:
The question is, how does someone NOT notice?
Posted on 14 May 2008 at 9:49 PM