Cervical cancer in Ghana
By Jess McCabe | 21 June 2008, 19:30
I don’t really have anything to say about this description of both treatment and lack of detection and treatment of cervical and breast cancer in Ghana. But it has to be read:
This hospital is one of just two with cancer centres, and between them they serve a country with a population of 23 million…
But this treatment - low dose brachytherapy - is not pleasant.
Radioactive material is inserted into the cervix via tubes, which are held in place with metal gynaecological devices.
The doctor showed me the equipment and it looked distinctly uncomfortable.
But it was worse than I thought.
For this treatment the patient must stay alone in this room for 50 consecutive hours.
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.


Shea said:
This sounds particularly dire, even by African standards. Although did you know it is common in Africa to sterilise high risk equipment such as scalpels with pressure cookers? No wonder the life expectancy is so low. Just think if this chickenhawk government took OUR money that it decided to spend on the cold war throwback Trident and spent it on something actually likely to increase world peace and security, like decent healthcare and clean water for the world's poorest twenty countries, we would all be safer and better off. Who was it that said, men will be living on the moon before we cure cancer?
Posted on 22 June 2008 at 11:44 AM
Jess said:
The treatment described here is still used to treat locally advanced cervical cancer in the UK and is considered quite effective when combined in chemotherapy. Unfortunately cervical cancer is the biggest cause of death from cancer in young women in less developed countries, primarily due to the absence or poor coverage of cervical screening. In addition, with all the hype about the cervical cancer vaccine that is now available, the inability of poorer women accross the world to access this expensive vaccine is a disgrace.
Posted on 23 June 2008 at 1:17 PM
Shea said:
But not for fifty consecutive hours surely?
I don't want to be pedantic, but I believe ovarian cancer is a greater killer of women in the majority world. I'm willing to be corrected though.
Posted on 24 June 2008 at 8:00 AM
Jess said:
Yes, internal radiation (brachytherapy) can be used continuously for many days at a time in either short bursts or continuously. Please see:
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=9195
I am afraid I have to disagree with you Shea, in the UK cervical cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in young women (under 35) after breast cancer. In poorer countries, because of the lack of pap smear screening it is, unfortunately, the leading cause of cancer death.
Posted on 24 June 2008 at 3:08 PM