Gender stereotypes…
Via Feminist Philosophers - like jj, I’m not completely convinced that this successfully punctures gender stereotypes - as the last few frames suggest is the intention. I think it might rely overmuch on the idea that stereotypes are obviously stupid. And some of the examples seem not to be so much stereotypes as actual constraints on many women’s lives.
As an aside, this was found posted at The Situationist, a Harvard website. Perhaps Harvard has another sort of definition of Situationism that I’m not aware of, but it seems a bit strange to see Harvard embracing it?!
Posted by Jess McCabe on 5 August 2008, at 11:11 PM | Comments (6)
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.


Liz said:
What it seems to be saying is that everybody really wants a wife.
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 1:45 AM
apu said:
Actually how did this puncture any stereotypes at all? Perhaps I'm not getting the joke - it seemed as if it just presented a whole lot of stereotypes!
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 5:45 AM
Molly said:
Not a fan. I've seen a video in a VERY similar style, also Italian, making fun of, well, Italians (little circles with EU stars standing politely in line while little circles with Italian-flag colors push in front of each other and curse, kind of thing), and that one definitely was just reinforcing stereotypes.
I don't think this one's giving anything but lip service to the idea that stereotypes (gasp!) might not be accurate.
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 6:29 AM
Rachael said:
Perhaps Harvard was attempting to make fun of stereotypes but it really doesn't come across that way to the casual observer. If you didn't know it's about stereotypes you would just watch and think "Aw, bless .... look what the silly girls are doing" since there is no comedy-value in the man's behaviour.
I think it's been establised that many universities are currently suffering from what's been called "fun-feminism". In other words - let's be blatantly sexist...then call it "irony". And why should Harvard be any different?
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 10:43 AM
Genevieve said:
What's annoying is that a lot of people who watch this are probably going to think that all the "silly woman" behaviors are "just the way it is." Rather than, yes, (some of us) pack lots of clothes on trips, and yes, (some of us) take a longer time shopping...but that's because we're encouraged, from a young age, to be conscious of our appearance, far more so than men are. If we didn't have these social pressures? Then things would be a lot different. Same with the 'going out' thing--men might want to look nice for a date but they expect to get by mainly on charm. Women have been taught that they must look perfect, that everything else is secondary. (Which is funny because I believe it took me about two minutes to change from my school clothes into my 'date' clothes the first time my boyfriend and I went out, and while I knew I looked good the best part about that evening was the conversation.) We have all of these products thrown at us to make us pretty, to increase our 'worth.' And why? Because as many gains as feminism has made, we still have a long way to go before mainstream society sees women as autonomous humans and not as decorations or possessions for men.
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 5:14 PM
E-Visible Woman said:
Yeah, and it was just crap.
I didn't like how the female voices were like a cross between a baby and a hen.
Posted on 06 August 2008 at 9:05 PM