Google thinks clitorises are unmentionable
By Jess McCabe | 24 November 2008, 16:51
The word “clitoris” is on a Google list of words ‘banned’ from its safe search option, according to Susie Bright.
Google’s filtered search option is, largely, a good thing in my view - for one thing, it means I can search for images at work!
But Google is set up so that if you search for the word “clitoris” with safe search options turned on, you will get zero results. A similar search for “penis” turns up 33 million results, Bright says.
Ever since the Breast Cancer Support group on AOL got shut down by the parent company for using the word “breast,” it’s been clear that women’s health, bodies, and sexual politics are “Not Safe for Work,” and beyond the pale of decent conversation and discourse.
Have your say
In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.
- This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
- All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
- No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
- Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
- No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
- Be nice.
- Latest Posts
- New review: Looking For Leonora
- Boyfriend pressing you for sex? Buy him a scented candle!
- Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- August comments and review comments, for your perusal
- More on floods in Pakistan and gender impact
- Coalition will not endorse EU directive against trafficking
- New review - Awra Amba
- Forced divorce and sterilisation: a reality for many transgender persons
- Weekly Round-Up And Open Thread # 5
- New feature: On campus, feminism wavers
- More posts
- Latest Comments
- Lisa Harney on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- Butch Cassidyke on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- Laura Woodhouse on Boyfriend pressing you for sex? Buy him a scented candle!
- White Plimsoles on Boyfriend pressing you for sex? Buy him a scented candle!
- Quiet Riot Girl on Boyfriend pressing you for sex? Buy him a scented candle!
- starsandscars on Boyfriend pressing you for sex? Buy him a scented candle!
- Helen G on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- polly on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- Carrie on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- Helen G on Out of sight, out of mind? - Transgender People’s Experiences of Domestic Abuse
- Reclaiming The F-Word
Founder of The F-Word, Catherine Redfern, has co-authored a new book with Kristin Aune. Find out more at the Reclaiming The F-Word website.
- More feminist bloggers
- There are plenty of fantastic UK feminist bloggers around. For a fantastic introduction to feminist blogging, go to the Carnival of Feminists website, which showcases the finest feminist posts from around the blogsphere, including many from UK blogs.
- How to contribute to The F-Word
- Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info
- Events
- Check out our events listings for info on some of the fantastic feminist events going on up and down the country. Please get in touch to tell us about events we've not listed yet.
- Small Print
- All blog posts are the views of the individual post author, and not those of The F-Word.
Feeds
Riot Kitty said:
That is just sexist beyond belief.
Posted on 25 November 2008 at 4:19 AM
Leigh said:
Vagina is allowed and gives 21,000,000 results, less than penis at 37,000,000.
Not very pleased with Google for this. I will send them an email complaining.
Posted on 25 November 2008 at 11:44 AM
Leigh said:
Okay sent them:
"Not sure where to file this- but I am objecting to your policy of censoring searched for 'clitoris' but not 'penis' in your safe search filter. Seeing female sexuality as worthy of more censorship than male is part of an unfortunate history of misogyny in western society, and I would have expected Google to be aware of this and above it. If you are going to continue to exclude searches for 'clitoris' from Safe searches, please also exclude 'penis', or make exceptions for both that in searches that include 'health' or similar phrases. I await your response at the email address above.
Many thanks,
Leigh"
I sent it through the privacy feedback form because I could not find a better means of contacting Google, not even an email or a websearch general feedback form. Anybody else who wants to might also think to include this new story.
Leigh
Posted on 25 November 2008 at 12:02 PM
Lizzie said:
I just checked this out and true enough, on strict safe search 'clitoris' 'did not match any documents' (wtf?!?! why give that explantation?), wheras penis, vagina and anal sex (which i searched out of curiosity because of the taboo) were all allowed.
So is the chief organ of female pleasure more 'explicit' than men's or even sodomy? Apparently Google thinks so.
Unsuprising, but still disgusting.
Leigh-I'll try to contact them too.
Posted on 26 November 2008 at 1:10 PM