Intersexuality - XXY

Mia Nikasimo writes weekly on transgender issues. Using the Argentinian film XXY as a point of reference she begins a discussion on intersex.

In XXY, a film from Argentina, Alex, the film’s protagonist, is a 14 year old intersex child who comes face to face with society’s prejudice.1 The close knit community of this small fishing village is populated by people this child would have viewed as neighbours. However because of the child’s intersexuality which in this case shows a female bodied child gradually turning male which is suggested abundantly throughout the film. The child’s secret is leaked somehow by an acquaintance and everyone is either curious, offended or out rightly oppressive towards Alex. Fearing their society’s reaction towards their child, the Alex’s parents invite a surgeon to see if the tide could be stopped. Under pressure even Alex seemed willing to give in but as long as the outcome is male rather than female gender identity, an already suggested gay sexuality in the mix (i.e. not lesbian as some might assume.) Although to my mind the film reflects society’s gender paranoia, I think it best that you judge it yourselves… How can a human child of fourteen be treated in the way depicted in the film does simply because of the child’s intersexed status? Continue reading Intersexuality - XXY

Your Comments

polly styrene said:

The condition being described here is, I assume, Klinefelter's syndrome - most people with this condition are actually identified as male from birth, and continue with this assignment. They may requite testosterone replacement therapy as adults to prevent osteporosis.

The huge majority of 'intersex' people are actually given a male or female sex at birth which they are happy to continue with. Most "intersex" conditions are in fact chromosomal variations, such as Turners syndrome or Androgen Insensitivity syndrome, and people with them will appear externally to be either male or female.

It can actually be quite distressing to a number of people with intersex conditions such as AIS to have their conditions linked/confused with gender identity issues, as the two are usually separate. For instance the Androgen Insenstitivy Syndrome Support Group say:

"Intersex is not the same as a transsexual (gender dysphoria) or as a transgender state. Neither term is one that we recognise as belonging in any general discussion of intersex. We are not happy with the recent tendency of some trans groups/people to promote transgender as an umbrella term to encompass, for example, transsexuality, transvestitism and intersex. We object to other organisations/individuals putting us in categories without consulting us, especially categories that imply that interexed people, of necessity, have gender identity issues.

The problems this causes...

We are constantly trying to get away from the idea that intersex is necessarily to do with gender identity, a notion that others (including the press/media) like to impose on us. Moreover, the prefix trans- infers a "moving across" and although a few people with intersex conditions may choose to change their gender role, the vast majority never "go" anywhere in terms of their sex or their gender, but are happy to stay in the status in which they grew up"

http://www.aissg.org/21_OVERVIEW.HTM

It probably isn't helpful to the majority of people who are 'intersex' to have this confusion promoted, which it constantly is in many discussions of this type.

Posted on 16 December 2008 at 12:44 PM

Soirore said:

The character in the film is not typical of intersex people because she* wasn't given a gender at birth although brought up as a girl she retains both male and female genitalia. The film is at the point where Alex is choosing whether to define herself* as male or female or refuse medical/surgical intervention altogether and remain undefined (in want of a better word).

In this way a trans analysis of the film is perfectly valid as the realities of intersex science are not dealt with but the choice of/affiliation with a gendered identity is. If anything it is a fault of the film not of the post about it.

*I use feminine pronouns as Alex is identified as a girl in the film

Posted on 16 December 2008 at 1:34 PM

Nicky said:

The problem here is that trans people will see the movie in their eyes and in the context of their world view. I think that they don't understand that we are not like them and were not the same as them.

Posted on 16 December 2008 at 6:49 PM

Anon said:

I agree with polly and Nicky.

Intersex is NOT the same as transgender. This confusion is not helpful to people with either condition.

There is a distinction between *gender* and *sex*. It's possible to not be traditionally masculine or feminine, as these are social constructs, without having a problem with one's sex; equally, transgender people aren't necessarily traditionally macho or girlie. They are simply born the wrong *sex*.
Thus intersex people *may* be 'confused' but it's probably because people are trying to force them into a box, not because there is anything inherently wrong with them or their identity. Good info here:

http://www.channel4.com/health/microsites/0-9/4health/body/gen_intersex.html

Gender is far too central to our understanding of people; it's just one aspect of a person, after all. It also isn't a binary, male or female, like black or white; there are shades of grey.

I speak as a woman with Turner's syndrome.
In fact, I believe this is not actually an 'intersex' condition (as Polly explains, that term is problematic anyway). There is no gender ambiguity; women with Turner's syndrome are XO i.e. have one X chromosome. As such most women with Turner's are infertile and there can be other health problems; I am relatively fortunate. However, a Y chromosome is required for the development of male characteristics.

Posted on 19 December 2008 at 5:02 PM

Anne Onne said:

I recognise that the two are different. Transgender people are born physically one sex, which is to say that they develop the healthy biological functions of one sex, fertility and all, but they mentally feel that they are the other gender, and many wish to physically convert to the other sex, to feel that they are being who they want to be. Whether the reason for their gender alignment, whether someone feels they 'fit' with the sex of their body or not, is the product of brain chemistry/anatomy or something more complex, it is not physical: their sex is unequivocally

Intersex people on the other hand, are, as a result of chromosomes, or endocrine problems, born with (or develop) physical manifestations of sex that don't neatly fit the 'male' or 'female' categories. Often, this is found early, and the children are raised as whichever sex and gender they 'are' more, biologically speaking.

Many, it has been pointed out, are happy with the choice made for them, and this raises the important point that even physiological differences that complicate one's sex don't suddenly make someone feel 'male' rather than 'female', which I think is part of what you were suggesting. That being intersex, or having been intersex, and having now been given a gender and treatment, many feel strongly associated with the gender given, and that gender identity issues are not a given when the physical system is altered somewhat. I understand that.

However, just as a non-intersex person can be transgender, can't an intersex person be transgender, too? I raise this not to imply that the groups are the same, or even similar (transgender, transvestite and intersex people are clearly very different) but that there can be an overlap, just as one can be a person of colour and a lesbian, and transgender.

For some people who are born intersex, they may not identify with the sex and gender chosen at birth, and the experiences intersex people go through may well lead some to question their gender. Not because gender identity and sex are linked, so that having one atypical means that the other must be different, but because going through a process that challenges gender norms and what society expects may lead to a lot of thinking. I

feel that only those who follow norms (gender, sex, sexuality etc) without thinking never stop to pause and think where they fall in the spectrum. I know that thinking about these issues has made me consider where I really fall amongst it all.

I'm sure lots of people can explain it more eloquently, but I always find that disambiguation is useful. I feel that as the media lumps people who are 'other' into a group, we sometimes end up mirroring this because there are some things common between them: in this case directly challenging the gender binary with the presentation of non- traditional physical sex or gender identity that does not match the physical sex. It's a complex issue, and it's really interesting to see input from transgender and intersex people, because so often it feels like so many voices are missing from this kind of discussion.

Posted on 20 December 2008 at 12:37 PM

Jane said:

Anne wrote:
"However, just as a non-intersex person can be transgender, can't an intersex person be transgender, too? I raise this not to imply that the groups are the same, or even similar (transgender, transvestite and intersex people are clearly very different) but that there can be an overlap, just as one can be a person of colour and a lesbian, and transgender."

Yes they can, I have two friends that have intersex conditions (there's more than 30 known variations), but their intersex has also created issues relating to their sex/gender, and are going through gender reassignment.

Posted on 20 December 2008 at 2:31 PM

Steph said:

This is an excellent video of an intersex individual whom is also trans:

http://current.com/items/89405000/i_m_80_girl_20_boy.htm

Posted on 20 December 2008 at 7:47 PM

Nick Chaleunphone said:

Anne Onne,
The problem here is that intersex is not the same as transgender. Intersex needs go way beyond the needs of the trans community. Intersex is more chromosomal, genetic and biological.Whereas trans is more the mind and the brain issue.

As with the movie XXY, i think it's very good and the only problems i can see is that the transpeople will try to claim that the movie speaks for them, when in reality, it doesn't and the movie only speaks about the intersex people only and not to the transpeople.

Posted on 21 December 2008 at 3:23 AM

Have your say

In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.

  1. This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
  2. All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
  3. No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
  4. Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
  5. No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
  6. Be nice.

Please note that your email address will not be displayed on this website. All comments are checked, prior to being published on this site.

< back | top ^ | next >

Latest Posts
'Impossibly perfect', music video edition
Vagina Rex and the Gas Oven
Women and Silent Britain
First Weekenders Club x2
Send a card, save a life?
Oxfordshire Reclaim the Night - tomorrow!
Forced marriage and 'honour' based abuse helpline faces closure.
Reclaim the Night Leeds
Feminist Spoons
New piece on CiF - 'Population control is not what makes climate change a feminist issue'
More posts
Latest Comments
Amylee on Send a card, save a life?
RadFemHedonist on Feminist Spoons
earwicga on Send a card, save a life?
Cazz on Send a card, save a life?
sima valand on Sima Valand due to be forcibly removed from the UK today (Fri 8th)
zohra on Feminist Spoons
BoB on JSA Rant
polly on JSA Rant
Soirore on Women and Silent Britain
Daniela Vincenti on Reclaim the Night Leeds
More feminist bloggers
There are plenty of fantastic UK feminist bloggers around. For a fantastic introduction to feminist blogging, go to the Carnival of Feminists website, which showcases the finest feminist posts from around the blogsphere, including many from UK blogs.
How to contribute to The F-Word
Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info
Events
Check out our events listings for info on some of the fantastic feminist events going on up and down the country. Please get in touch to tell us about events we've not listed yet.
Small Print
All blog posts are the views of the individual post author, and not those of The F-Word.

Inside this section

Blog Home
Archives by Month
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
More Archives
Archives by Author
Abby O'Reilly
Anne Onne
Barbara Felix
Bill Savage
Carrie Dunn
Catherine Redfern
Guest Blogger
Helen G
Holly Combe
Jess McCabe
Kate Smurthwaite
Kit Roskelly
Laura Woodhouse
Lola Adesioye
Louise Livesey
Lynne Miles
Milly Shaw
Philippa Willitts
Samara Ginsberg
Sokari Ekine
Sunny Hundal
Suzi FemAcadem
Yvonne Howard
zohra moosa
News prior to April 2005
XML feed Feeds
Latest Blog Posts
Latest Comments

Contact Us

This webpage lives at: http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2008/12/intersexuality_1