Round-up!

cedaw.jpgWe missed Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’s 30th birthday - definitely deserves more than a mention in this round-up, but for more reading see Gender Masala’s post at IPS.

Also at IPS, an interesting news story about gendered language in Spain vs Italy, in terms of how government ministers are referred to.

Bitch posts that a programme to tackle homophobia in sport has been cut.

Echidne of the Snakes reposts her useful primer on statistics.

Sokari at Black Looks remembers Busi.

A guest blogger at Sociological Images has some fun with the “gender socialisation” stereotypes on the cover of a toy catalogue.

Mexico City legalised same-sex marriage; Melissa at Shakesville posts details, plus photos.

Henrietta Spink highlights how the lack of portability of care packages for disabled people in the UK can keep people trapped in their local authority area. Via Pickled Politics.

A case in Sweden where an unconscious woman was given a gynaecological exam by medical students without her consent is just the tip of the iceburg, reports the Local.

The trailer for The Runaways, a film about fantastic Joan Jett, is out. Via Jezebel:

The Toronto Women’s Bookstore may have to close - Shameless says there are now only 21 women’s bookshops worldwide.

Nerves Strengthened By Tea reviews Tanith Lee’s revisionist fairy tales.

Annalee at io9 reviews Avatar, putting it in context of movies about white guilt.

This post about Rape Culture is a little old now, but worth revisiting.

Your Comments

earwicga said:

I saw Avatar yesterday and read Annalee's review today. I have one word for the review - CRAP! Please disregard every word of the review and go see the film as it is utterly amazing and brilliant.
The review utterly misses the total essence of the film. I feel sorry for Annalee that she chose her particular take on Avatar.
Nobody who has seen the film could possibly miss what it is about and write the tripe spouted in the link above.

Posted on 29 December 2009 at 11:08 PM

Jess McCabe said:

@earwicga I don't this Annalee's analysis is about whether the film is 'good' or 'bad', or a watchable story. I saw Avatar on Boxing Day. It's a very watchable film, but I do basically agree with Annalee's analysis. I'm actually pretty unclear from your comment on what points you disagree with what Annalee is saying, TBH.

Posted on December 30, 2009 11:27 AM

Elmo said:

A number of children's movies (which I am obviously way too cool to watch now, ahem) also the same theme as Avatar, in which random white male becomes cool king of simple alien/foreign/underwater people. Examples include Atlantis and The Road To El Dorado, and I always thought Tarzan was a bit of a metaphor for this as well. Then there is of course Last Of the Mahicans, and Dances with wolves like the reviewer mentions. I always used to cringe at these points in movies, it was just too embarrassing as a white person, because even when the film is about another race, it still needs to be about white people (well, white men), like the producers thought white people were too thick to understand other cultures. Even as a small child, I remember being acutely aware of this "them" and "us" situation, particularly the "clever white male stranger" and "quirky, but still in need of saving tribal girl" romance that went on-hello, they had spears! Why did they always need to be saved? Having said that, Avatar looks amazing in all other respects.

Posted on 30 December 2009 at 10:01 PM

Laura Woodhouse said:

I just came back from seeing Avatar. I certainly agree with the assessment of the white guilt / white man as saviour aspect of the film: the protagonist , Jake, (and Cameron, the writer) tries to make up for the evils of colonisation by helping the colonised (the Na'vi), but instead of becoming an ally he must be the saviour, the chosen one, the outsider who can come in and become a better Na'vi than the Na'vi in just three months. The scenes where he is filmed rising up as the leader made me feel a bit nauseous.

I also recognise the accusations of disablism based on the negative portrayal of Jake's disability and the miracle cure trope; but I did feel like a lot of the negative reaction to his disability came from others in the film and that we were not supposed to empathise with it. Other than his delight at being able to walk and run in his avatar, he seemed to just get on with things - his wheelchair and disability didn't seem to be much of an issue to him.

However, I don't think the film is sexist; in fact, it has a number of feminist plus points in my view. A high proportion of the main characters were female, the female lead (the Na'vi Neytiri) was the one who taught Jake how to fight and live as a Na'vi, she was charged with protecting her people when her father (the tribal leader) died, the tribe's deity is female, their spiritual leader is female (Neytiri's mother) and there was no clear gender role division within the tribe. Yes, Jake was told he could 'take a woman' when he became a warrior, but he responded by saying he'd only want to be with her if she wanted him. Best of all, Neytiri - the female love interest - actually heroically saved the male protagonists life, and we see her cradling him in her arms - how often does that happen in a Hollywood film?! The female Na'vi were no more physically exposed than the men, and when Sigorney Weaver was laid down to die and try and connect with her avatar, I saw her nakedness as a symbolism of her natural state and the connection with the Earth mother, not an attempt at sexualisation.

Posted on December 30, 2009 10:30 PM

Jehenna said:

I found it interesting that when Jake returns as 'leader' the first thing he does is ask for the leader's permission to speak. He makes it quite clear that he cannot be leader without his permission.

I actually found his return very interesting as instead of going in gung-ho with "I am now your boss", he defers to Tsu'tey. His attitude after returning was far more respectful and deferential than it was before, in my opinion.

Posted on 31 December 2009 at 11:12 AM

Have your say

In order to keep this blog as a feminist and friendly space, comments will be subject to some rules. We do not seek to censor debate: the beauty of the internet is that anyone can set up their own blog or website to express their views.

  1. This blog is a safe and friendly space for feminists and feminist allies. Debate and critique are welcome where it is constructive and deepens analysis or understanding. Anti-feminist comments will not be approved. We get to decide what's anti-feminist.
  2. All comments must be approved by one of the bloggers. For this reason, there may be a delay before your comment appears.
  3. No sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, classist, ablist comments, comments which make personal attacks on any blogger or commenter, or comments that are otherwise deemed offensive by us will be posted.
  4. Trolls will be banned from commenting. We get to decide who is a troll.
  5. No anonymous comments - please feel free to use your real name or make one up, though.
  6. Be nice.

Please note that your email address will not be displayed on this website. All comments are checked, prior to being published on this site.

top ^

Latest Posts
Women's Liberation Movement @ 40 - Reflections
What is feminism? First survey results
New feature: In conversation with Senzeni Marasela
New review: Daughters of Earth: Feminist Science Fiction in the Twentieth Century
Round-up!
What About Women?
New feature: Writing women back into punk
New feature: Painful vagina? Your poor husband!
Samira Ahmed, behind the scenes with C4 news
Hidden Herstories: Women of Change, see it for free!
More posts
Latest Comments
sianmarie on International Women's Day, Million Women Rise, and trans inclusion
Lynne Miles on International Women's Day, Million Women Rise, and trans inclusion
Catherine Redfern on What is feminism? First survey results
Catherine Redfern on What is feminism? First survey results
Catherine Redfern on What is feminism? First survey results
Politicalguineapig on International Women's Day, Million Women Rise, and trans inclusion
Elmo on What is feminism? First survey results
makomk on International Women's Day, Million Women Rise, and trans inclusion
nick on What is feminism? First survey results
Ally on What About Women?
More feminist bloggers
There are plenty of fantastic UK feminist bloggers around. For a fantastic introduction to feminist blogging, go to the Carnival of Feminists website, which showcases the finest feminist posts from around the blogsphere, including many from UK blogs.
How to contribute to The F-Word
Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info
Events
Check out our events listings for info on some of the fantastic feminist events going on up and down the country. Please get in touch to tell us about events we've not listed yet.
Small Print
All blog posts are the views of the individual post author, and not those of The F-Word.

Inside this section

Blog Home
Archives by Month
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
More Archives
Archives by Author
Abby O'Reilly
Amy Clare
Anne Onne
Barbara Felix
Bill Savage
Carrie Dunn
Catherine Redfern
Grace Fletcher-Hackwood
Guest Blogger
Helen G
Holly Combe
Jess McCabe
Joanna Whitehead
Jolene Tan
Josephine Tsui
Kate Smurthwaite
Kit Roskelly
Laura Woodhouse
Lola Adesioye
Louise Livesey
Lynne Miles
Milly Shaw
Philippa Willitts
Samara Ginsberg
Sokari Ekine
Sunny Hundal
Suzi FemAcadem
Syma Tariq
Yvonne Howard
zohra moosa
News prior to April 2005
XML feed Feeds
Latest Blog Posts
Latest Comments

Contact Us

This webpage lives at: http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2009/12/round-up_4