<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/blog/build/style/atom.css"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<logo>http://www.thefword.org.uk/images/logo2003.gif</logo>
<title>The F-Word: Latest Comments</title>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/feeds/comments.xml" />
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/" />
<updated>2012-02-09T13:06:21Z</updated>
<subtitle>Latest comments made on The F-Word Blog</subtitle>
<id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012://3</id>
<generator uri="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="5.12">Movable Type</generator>
<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The F-Word</rights>


<entry> 
<title>Hannah commented on &quot;An experience of crossing the gender divide: personal comfort before real difference&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/an_experience_of_crossing#c151712" />
<updated>2012-02-09T11:41:11Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T11:41:11Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151712</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Hannah said: Lovely to read such thoughtful reflections, please write more! The trans* population is hugely varied, and a gripe of mine has been that there is not enough engagement from TVs, cds, m2f s with feminist thinking, I hope your article represents a move in this direction.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Hannah</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Holly Combe commented on &quot;An experience of crossing the gender divide: personal comfort before real difference&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/an_experience_of_crossing#c151711" />
<updated>2012-02-09T09:36:00Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T09:36:00Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151711</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Holly Combe said: Thanks for contributing this piece, Jane. What you say about responding to the structural realities around us (i.e. with guys less constantly aware of danger) makes sense. It&apos;s a shame that circumstances and attitudes often force women to be more watchful but there it is. For now anyway.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Holly Combe</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Katherine commented on &quot;In defence of fake beauty&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2011/12/in_defence_of_fake#c151709" />
<updated>2012-02-08T18:28:17Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T18:28:17Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151709</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/">
<![CDATA[Katherine said: Muppet, I really like your comment. I never wear make-up because I think that I should be appreciated for being natural. TRULY natural. But this &quot;natural&quot; look that people try to achieve with make-up doesn&apos;t look natural at all; it looks like a doll. If you wanted to look natural why would you wear make-up at all? People obviously want to look better than natural but want to appear as if they haven&apos;t got any make-up on; that they are REALLY that beautiful naturally, which is obviously not true because no-one can be blemish-free and &quot;shining&quot; like that. What constitutes as &quot;natural&quot; beauty in today&apos;s world is looking like a plastic doll. ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Katherine</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Shadow commented on &quot;Bristol Feminist Network on closure of Hooters Bristol&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/bristol_feminis_3#c151707" />
<updated>2012-02-08T14:58:31Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T14:58:31Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151707</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Shadow said: There is work and then there is work which specifically degrades women employees and Hooters is one such company which ensures its female employees have to undertake their &apos;duties&apos; in accordance with portraying themselves as men&apos;s disposable sexual service stations.  

That is not work that is male sexual exploitation of women and as such should not even be termed &apos;work.&apos;  Women like men have fundamental rights and I did not see Hooters employing male staff to work as half naked disposable sexualised commodities.  Women are not and never were men&apos;s disposable sexualised commodities.  

One wonders why legislation was passed concerning male sexual/physical/verbal harassment of women within the workplace given Hooters made it mandatory for female staff to have to sign a waiver before they were employed.  This waiver absolved Hooters of any accountability as regards female staff having to endure male sexual/physical/verbal harassment whilst undertaking their duties. 

I&apos;m very pleased Hooters has closed because this is one victory against the prostitution industry and pseuodo male claims they are entitled to view women and girls as men&apos;s disposable sexual service stations.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Shadow</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Laurel commented on &quot;Bristol Feminist Network on closure of Hooters Bristol&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/bristol_feminis_3#c151705" />
<updated>2012-02-08T12:59:57Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T12:59:57Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151705</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Laurel said: yeah, it is a shame for the workers really. i have to stand by them and their organising as an anarchist really, BUT... FUCK, do i hate that company and what it stands for, so... no tears shed here! it was just out of place in Bristol. there are already adult bars (too many) with the same male-female relations, sadly, and having it normalised and child-friendly kinda sucks. imagine how the same people would react to a sexually and sexuality inclusive club with people of all genders and all body types performing for everybody in the way that they feel like it for free. bet theyd think it was perverse!]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Laurel</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Chrissy D commented on &quot;Woman&apos;s Hour discussion: the &quot;female masturbation&quot; taboo&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/01/womans_hour_discussion#c151702" />
<updated>2012-02-07T21:50:11Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-07T21:50:11Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151702</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Chrissy D said: Great comments - and for once I have nothing to add, except to agree that it is hard to agree on what to do with the colonisation.  For mainstream culture to &apos;admit&apos; that female sexuality exists away from patriarchial line of sight is the starting point, though, in my opinion.  And yes there is the occasional, novel discussion about a &apos;true&apos; version of female sexuality in our mainstream media, but not often, so keeping this discourse open (or opening it more fully) is also vital.  ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Chrissy D</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Laura Woodhouse commented on &quot;&quot;I didn&apos;t have a childhood at all...&quot;&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/i_didnt_have_a_#c151701" />
<updated>2012-02-07T12:48:43Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-07T12:48:43Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151701</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog">Laura Woodhouse</a> said: Thank you for sharing, Neesha. I&apos;m so glad CRASAC were there to help you.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Laura Woodhouse</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Ania Ostrowska commented on &quot;Woman&apos;s Hour discussion: the &quot;female masturbation&quot; taboo&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/01/womans_hour_discussion#c151700" />
<updated>2012-02-07T11:01:56Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-07T11:01:56Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151700</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Ania Ostrowska said: @Holly: obviously, my column suggestion was half-joking ;)

However, from the perspective of good sex education for women, the main target seems to be as many happily orgasming masturbating women as possible. Indeed, many women own and use vibrators; however, far too many women do not masturbate/ come at all or very very seldom.
The way I see it, any material (and sometimes the boundary between the educational and the commercial is blurry) that helps women discover their bodies and have fun with them is good. So if side effect of texts/pictues/campaigns encouraging women to masturbate (or openly talk about it) is men ridiculing such material or wanking to it, I would say: let them do that. This is not the point of it and frankly, who cares.

The problem with &quot;pandering to raunch culture&quot; argument is such that even though we agree that sexuality (especially female sexuality, but also more broadly heterosexuality) has been &apos;hijacked&apos; or &apos;colonised&apos; by patriarchal/male-dominated/raunch culture, we will never agree what to do with this colonisation. 

I will always say: reclaim it, show it, exhibit it, talk about it, play with it, sex is not the enemy. If you&apos;ve had a great wank and want to share it on the morning radio show, go for it. Don&apos;t worry about spoiling anybody&apos;s breakfast, a dismayed listener can always turn the radio off. 
Or make her/himself another bowl of porridge for that matter.
]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Ania Ostrowska</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Laurel commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151699" />
<updated>2012-02-07T08:33:39Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-07T08:33:39Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151699</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Laurel said: I went to Lincoln, and yet it was NUS, but the NUS is a pretty horrible beaurocracy to be honest. not easy to get anything through to anybody. not the fault of the officers. They just don&apos;t have much power. Never had this problem on a night out though, besides people thinking they were dancing with me.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Laurel</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>ErinD commented on &quot;Weekly round up&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/weekly_round_up_3#c151697" />
<updated>2012-02-06T22:32:30Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T22:32:30Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151697</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/erinndhesi" href="http://twitter.com/erinndhesi" rel="nofollow">ErinD</a> said: I wrote this

http://www.sabotagetimes.com/life/hard-knock-life-try-being-a-teenage-indian-feminist/

and people didn&apos;t think it was bad.

S&apos;all about the inadequacies of western feminism and how women of eatern culture are affected.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>ErinD</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Zoe commented on &quot;Challenging rape myths in the mainstream &quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2012/01/challenging_rape#c151696" />
<updated>2012-02-06T20:44:20Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T20:44:20Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151696</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/">
<![CDATA[Zoe said: Italy is a discrace, apparently men convicted of gang rape don&apos;t have to be jailed... http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/03/italian-court-gang-rape-jailed]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Zoe</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Zoe commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151695" />
<updated>2012-02-06T20:43:40Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T20:43:40Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151695</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Zoe said: Italy is a discrace, apparently men convicted of gang rape don&apos;t have to be jailed... http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/03/italian-court-gang-rape-jailed]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Zoe</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Holly Combe commented on &quot;Woman&apos;s Hour discussion: the &quot;female masturbation&quot; taboo&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/01/womans_hour_discussion#c151693" />
<updated>2012-02-06T18:26:18Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T18:26:18Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151693</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Holly Combe said: @Ania. Well, at the risk of sounding like an indulgent &quot;fun feminist&quot;, I&apos;m always up for chatting about wanking but I guess that would be a tough one to run without

a) attracting ridicule on the basis that men somehow &quot;wouldn&apos;t talk about it in that way&quot;. (Of course, it stands to reason that having your masturbatory life taken as a given by society means you aren&apos;t going to require special space to talk about it. Also, funny stories about finding tea and biscuits on the side after cracking one off are commonplace for men anyway.)
b) being perceived to be pandering to raunch culture.

Actually, I care much less about the second one, as I think neutralising the significance of the possible male spectator is an important part of having these kinds of discussions on our own terms. What dudes think either way would not be the point!]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Holly Combe</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Ms. Sunlight commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151692" />
<updated>2012-02-06T18:07:21Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T18:07:21Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151692</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Ms. Sunlight said: anneLou - I would suspect it comes from the National Union of Students.  Here&apos;s a link to their study:

http://www.nus.org.uk/en/news/news/1-in-7-women-students-is-a-victim-of-sexual-assault-or-violence/]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Ms. Sunlight</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Sarah McAlpine commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151691" />
<updated>2012-02-06T17:52:48Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T17:52:48Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151691</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" href="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" rel="nofollow">Sarah McAlpine</a> said: anne lou- you can find the study at www.hiddenmarks.org.uk - a study carried out by the NUS Women&apos;s campaign. ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Sarah McAlpine</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>anneLou commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151690" />
<updated>2012-02-06T14:47:02Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T14:47:02Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151690</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[anneLou said: Hey! Great article, I would like to use the 1 in 7 stat in my work, where do you reference it to? Thanks.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>anneLou</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Shadow commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151689" />
<updated>2012-02-06T14:32:07Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T14:32:07Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151689</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Shadow said: &apos;Women have to live in this culture every day, wherever they go.&apos;  Precisely and that culture is the now normalised and widely accepted one of misogyny and acceptance  men have the right to view/treat women as dehumanised sexual service stations. Now where do such ideas emanate from?  We need look no further than mainstream media and popular culture, both which endlessly promote male hatred/male contempt for women as &apos;ironic/funny/post modern etc.&apos; all of which are used to minimalise/deny the reality of embedded male hatred/male contempt for women and girls.

Male Supremacy is not something invisible - it is real and fact male university students consider it their right to subject female students to male sexual harassment is indeed frightening.  These males once they graduate will continue their campaign of viewing/treating women as disposable sexual service stations and when these males obtain employment they will subject female employees to the same male sexual harassment/verbal violence.  

But naming the problem as male violence/male hatred/male contempt for women is seen as divisive and promoting myth women are being labelled as victims.  But as usual these are common tactics used to ensure focus is never on male accountability or even on how male supremacy system ensures  men are the ones accorded greater socio-economic power than women. and as always it is men&apos;s version of &apos;definitive truth&apos; which is widely accepted as &apos;reality!&apos;  Hence the reason why so many commentators engaged in women-hating rhetoric because holding men accountable is a &apos;no no&apos; in male supremacist systems.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Shadow</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Ania Ostrowska commented on &quot;Woman&apos;s Hour discussion: the &quot;female masturbation&quot; taboo&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/01/womans_hour_discussion#c151688" />
<updated>2012-02-06T13:35:30Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T13:35:30Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151688</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Ania Ostrowska said: I was wondering, perhaps we should run a weekly column called &quot;Your masturbation stories&quot;?
To break the taboo.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Ania Ostrowska</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Holly Combe commented on &quot;Woman&apos;s Hour discussion: the &quot;female masturbation&quot; taboo&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/01/womans_hour_discussion#c151687" />
<updated>2012-02-06T12:22:40Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T12:22:40Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151687</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Holly Combe said: @Tom Midlane. While I agree the &quot;nitty gritty&quot; of techniques isn&apos;t something women or men are generally expected to discuss openly in public, I do think there are different expectations of us. After all, we still live with the legacy of a gender dichotomy where men&apos;s masturbation and autonomous sexuality is traditionally taken as a given but women&apos;s is not. Doesn&apos;t this mean that the terms within which women and men are expected to talk about masturbation are often very different?

We surely know that men are not automatic raging sex machines (without sexual complexity) and women are not automatic passive receptacles for those apparent needs (without desires that are just our own) but the media seems determined to play this stereotype out. Under this dichotomy, women&apos;s masturbation is not taken as a given. It is presented as exotic, titillating and less usual and therefore suspected to be a performance for someone else&apos;s arousal. Meanwhile, men&apos;s masturbation is commonly framed as distasteful but essential. (From what I’ve seen, any suggestion that a man may not do it is typically met with scoffing and disbelief!) 

Thankfully, as your example possibly demonstrates, there are times when enlightened friends in mixed groups are *all* at liberty to refer to the solo side of their sex lives in a banal and passing fashion. However, it seems to me that there are many settings where this equality doesn’t exist. Women are still framed as “other” and I reckon this often means the socially acceptable options are for us to either pretend we don&apos;t wank at all or make the discussion as titillating as possible.
]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Holly Combe</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>anywavewilldo commented on &quot;Ask A Feminist #4: Does my sex life let the side down?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/ask_a_feminist_6#c151686" />
<updated>2012-02-06T12:15:51Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T12:15:51Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151686</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" href="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" rel="nofollow">anywavewilldo</a> said: ps - folk might want to take a look at Kitty Stryker&apos;s blog and her work on power and consent - including the link pasted to a blog carnival of personal stories:
please note I&apos;m flagging up as not safe for work, p0rn, abuse/rape and BDSM inc. bondage photos on lower posts if you wish to avoid

http://purrversatility.blogspot.com/2012/02/safeward-blog-carnival-2-part-2-trigger.html]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>anywavewilldo</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>anywavewilldo commented on &quot;Ask A Feminist #4: Does my sex life let the side down?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/ask_a_feminist_6#c151685" />
<updated>2012-02-06T11:56:19Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T11:56:19Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151685</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" href="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" rel="nofollow">anywavewilldo</a> said: @fembot - nothing is private in that it is outside of patriarchy [or other parts of kyriarchy] - we are inside it and it is inside us - we are also partly free and our choices and behaviour matter inside any room and whoever is present. Do you really think you can close a door on the world and fuck in isolation? 

safe, sane and entusiastic consent is possible to many things that do not liberate women in general: from hiring a nanny while her kids are brought up by a relative &apos;back home&apos;; to cosmetic surgery that errodes another woman&apos;s body confidence and class-marked access to a certain sort or appearance; to heterosexual D O-&gt;/s 0+ sex with an-oh-so-feminist man  

@Tabitha Long - I think the kink talk about playing with power to unmask it is largely empty rhetoric (though maybe not entirely) - go have a look at the reception Kitty Stryker is getting for challenging her own kink community about consent for example: folk saying safe words are only for the weak and why would a dom &apos;allow&apos; a sub to &apos;choose&apos; when to stop... blah blah blah. There are certainly other ways to do it; political activism, art, CR groups, drama, clowning, martial arts

everyone: is feminism norming to a place where the worst thing we can do is &apos;upset&apos; someone, or call out actions? to mix my metaphors: you can&apos;t upset an applecart without breaking some eggs]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>anywavewilldo</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>anywavewilldo commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151684" />
<updated>2012-02-06T11:33:55Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T11:33:55Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151684</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" href="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" rel="nofollow">anywavewilldo</a> said: @Yes: &quot;And if you say anything against it people think you&apos;re a hairy feminist lesbian&quot; - I am a hairy feminist lesbian - when people (sic) try and faze you out of challenging sexism by using heterosexism as a threat - I think it&apos;s best to summon up some solidarity rather than distance yourself. ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>anywavewilldo</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>rose411 commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151681" />
<updated>2012-02-06T00:01:19Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-06T00:01:19Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151681</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[rose411 said: oh my gosh, I gasped in horror when I read what the quote was on that disgraceful website!!
How could someone express such a thing is beyond belief. I hope someone swings a crowbar in his balls really hard by accident! That&apos;ll give a little karma relief.
rape is wrong, should never happen and should end forever.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>rose411</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Zoë Scandrett commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151680" />
<updated>2012-02-05T23:59:03Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T23:59:03Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151680</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/Tunifishi" href="http://twitter.com/Tunifishi" rel="nofollow">Zoë Scandrett</a> said: You could always campaign to your union to get a Women&apos;s Officer. Try emailing Estelle Hart (estelle.hart@nus.org.uk) - NUS Women&apos;s Officer - to ask how to go about it. The NUS Women&apos;s Campaign can help you out :)]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Zoë Scandrett</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Sarah McAlpine commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151679" />
<updated>2012-02-05T23:05:08Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T23:05:08Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151679</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" href="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" rel="nofollow">Sarah McAlpine</a> said: @Laurel is your university affiliated with the NUS? Most NUS Student Unions will have positions for LGBT, Ethnic Minorities, Disabled and Women&apos;s Officers- although, sadly, they are not always filled. 

If not, is there a Welfare Officer you could talk to? Or a democratic structure you&apos;d feel safe in to get your issues heard?

Do you mind if I ask what University you attend? ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Sarah McAlpine</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Tabitha Long commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151678" />
<updated>2012-02-05T23:04:32Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T23:04:32Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151678</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Tabitha Long said: When I was at university I was known to kick off at anyone who groped me uninvited while on a night out. I was (and still am) not afraid to educate people as to why they have no right to lay their hands on me. Curiously, it seemed the more I fit their image of someone who looked like they &apos;invited&apos; that kind of interaction, the more effective my words were. I hope I made a few people question their attitudes by speaking out, when so many may feel uncomfortable about objecting. 

The sad thing is that women are still encouraged to find value in sexual attention. So many of my friends (strong, intelligent people) found it flattering when someone felt them up. They didn&apos;t seem to get that it had nothing to do with them personally.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Tabitha Long</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Tabitha Long commented on &quot;Ask A Feminist #4: Does my sex life let the side down?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/ask_a_feminist_6#c151677" />
<updated>2012-02-05T22:54:42Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T22:54:42Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151677</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Tabitha Long said: @anywavewilldo - Blimey, I may not agree with you entirely, but your post sure does make me want to sit down and talk through these ideas with a whiskey in hand (or other beverage of choice!)

I do think d/s play is a way to &apos;explore the ropes that bind us&apos;, as it were, and a natural part of exploring our environment. That said, couldn&apos;t agree more with your comment about orgasm being a dangerous tool for encouraging specific behaviour. As with every part of life, sex shouldn&apos;t be devoid of ethical consideration.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Tabitha Long</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Laurel commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151676" />
<updated>2012-02-05T21:21:37Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T21:21:37Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151676</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Laurel said: not many unis have a womans officer. we had liberation officer, bt theyre pretty limited on what campaigns they can do. theyre supposed to take on a set amount. 2 small and one big, in a year like, and its got to cover every single discrimination...]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Laurel</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Fembot commented on &quot;Ask A Feminist #4: Does my sex life let the side down?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/ask_a_feminist_6#c151675" />
<updated>2012-02-05T20:19:41Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T20:19:41Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151675</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Fembot said: Can a private relationship between two psychologically healthy individuals (in this context, feminist) actually uphold patriarchy? I&apos;m not convinced. Can relationships that are based on taking advantage of unhealthy thoughts or esteem or a belief that one party is unequal? I would say so. But that&apos;s the same for vanilla relationships as much as D/s ones. ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Fembot</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Sarah McAlpine commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151674" />
<updated>2012-02-05T20:02:50Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T20:02:50Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151674</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" href="http://twitter.com/sazza_jay" rel="nofollow">Sarah McAlpine</a> said: In reply to &quot;Yes&quot;- you could try talking to your Student Union&apos;s Women&apos;s Officer about the introduction of a Zero Tolerance policy, http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/news/article/6074/1341/ which many Student Union&apos;s up and down the country are taking. 

It&apos;s not going to solve all the problems you experience when you&apos;re out, but it might be a good place to start =]]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Sarah McAlpine</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Sal P-A commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151673" />
<updated>2012-02-05T19:49:41Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T19:49:41Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151673</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/Sal_PA" href="http://twitter.com/Sal_PA" rel="nofollow">Sal P-A</a> said: Speaking as a university lecturer, articles like &quot;How to fuck your lecturer&quot;, although not illegal, are also a problem - not only are they disrespectful but precipitate difficult situations in which female lectures face unwanted sexual attention.  At my university sexual relationships between students and staff (quite rightly) come under a lot of scrutiny – and with me – like most, (dare I say all), of my female peers - its frankly never gonna happen!  So propagating this idea that it’s both common and welcome is generally not helpful in exacerbating the difficult position female lecturers can find ourselves in, working in a very male dominated arena.  I have been lucky, or perhaps pro-active, in managing potential situations, but clearly these &apos;lads&apos; don&apos;t think I deserve the same amount of respect as my male peers.  Moreover, most universities would take a very dim view of students sexually harrassing their lecturers - the students themselves stand to lose out if they for a second &apos;buy in&apos; to this lad culture.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Sal P-A</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Yes. commented on &quot;Unilad: an entire culture summed up in one hideous website&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/unilad_an_entir#c151672" />
<updated>2012-02-05T19:32:58Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T19:32:58Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151672</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/itchybobsaget" href="http://twitter.com/itchybobsaget" rel="nofollow">Yes.</a> said: &apos;&apos;Unwanted groping is par for the course on a standard night out.&apos;&apos; I am a uni student and this is so true. And if you say anything against it people think you&apos;re a hairy feminist lesbian.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Yes.</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Shelly commented on &quot;You&apos;ll catch your death in that&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/reviews/2012/02/youll_catch_you#c151670" />
<updated>2012-02-05T16:17:33Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T16:17:33Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151670</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/Bravetank" href="http://twitter.com/Bravetank" rel="nofollow">Shelly</a> said: Thank you for reading and commenting. :) You are all right of course - my tank should wear what she wants to wear and I should care a lot less about people&apos;s perceptions of me and assumptions they might make. Will try it &amp; see. I agree - the skimpier stuff should be available to both male &amp; female. That&apos;s the key. Probably all sorts of assumptions would be made about a guy in the skimpier stuff too?

I&apos;ve come across that &quot;dude&quot; thing as well - not just in game. My former boss used to call me it all the time. It was really odd. He didn&apos;t do it to anyone else. He also used to shorten my name. In the beginning I thought it was just friendliness - but later things happened to suggest a fundamental lack of respect and a view of me as some little thing that needed protecting (&amp; he was completely not up to that even if I had needed it - which I didn&apos;t). So I have an aversion to that term anyway!!]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Shelly</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>anywavewilldo commented on &quot;Ask A Feminist #4: Does my sex life let the side down?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/ask_a_feminist_6#c151669" />
<updated>2012-02-05T14:45:39Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-05T14:45:39Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151669</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" href="http://twitter.com/anywavewilldo" rel="nofollow">anywavewilldo</a> said: Vanilla privilege - that’s a term for real? I think that’s a very counterproductive way of looking at things, and an insult to anti-oppressive liberation movements. Not everything that is marginalised is desirable or about freedom. 

I’m writing from an anarcha/rad feminist perspective: If I believe in no gods, no slaves, no masters for all human society then why would I make an exception for the erotic? I don’t think having orgasms while ‘playing’ with power is a good way to dissolve kyriarchy because orgasm is a fairly good motivator to keep repeating the same behaviour.

The kink/ vanilla dichotomy is fairly stupid as power relations exist in all sexual interactions. I try and have sex that doesn’t make power differences more - this doesn’t make it vanilla. 

If I object to women thinking it’s cool to play at Nazis, or plantations, or rape then I’m not being vanilla privileged I’m calling out racism and sexism like I would in any other setting..

I don’t think D/ s sex is feminist - but getting into purity politics about who is a good feminist is fairly pointless on an individual level - yes the white supremacist, capitalist, hetpatriarchy is in everything we do: but we do choose, we do name better and worse; right and wrong - or we wouldn’t be feminists. 

If you’re gonna do kink then do free range kink - but don’t think this is going to bring down ‘the system’ and perhaps consider the ways in which it might be holding it up.
]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>anywavewilldo</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>jasmine21 commented on &quot;Men who want to get you pregnant&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2008/08/men_who_want_to#c151666" />
<updated>2012-02-04T23:58:50Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-04T23:58:50Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151666</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[jasmine21 said: Very interesting article. I am studying to be a Pediatric Nurse, and so obviously I love children. People assume that being around babies all day will make me want one as soon as possible, and I think my career choice has actually put men off me, because they are expecting me to be baby oriented! But I just cannot imagine completely sacrificing my life for a child, I don&apos;t think it should be about choosing between a family and a career, but I would much rather be established in my job when I have a child, something men don&apos;t have to think about. But my current partner wants me to think about having a child as soon as I have finished university, he is a few years older and cannot wait to be a dad. Sorry but I don&apos;t want to start my maternity leave when I have barely been working 5 minutes. It seems as though I have to choose between him and my immediate career....not really a difficult choice. ]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>jasmine21</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Laurel commented on &quot;When is an affair not an affair? (Trigger warning)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/when_is_an_affa#c151665" />
<updated>2012-02-04T16:19:26Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-04T16:19:26Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151665</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Laurel said: legally, very true, esp with the paedo-hating daily mail backtracking just to victim blame.

i would question though, how this article would read if it was legal. in spain and japan the age of consent is 13, and many countries have it lower than the UK. obviously this is for children of that age to explore their own sexualities.

as a nation we do not have rules on age differences, but perhaps whilst young, a rule on age differences would make more sense in the way that we have laws against people in other positions of power having sex with those under their authority. i would argue that there are many a happy relationship between younger and older partners even from a young age.

with that in mind, that doctors cannot sleep with their patients and teachers cannot sleep with their students, does it even make sense that police officers should be able to sleep with people they have legal authority over, such as the majority of civillians? let alone children?

its a horrible story and im sorry if im trivialising it, but i think its interesting to see where our morals on this issue come from and whether our cultural values are necessarily the norm or the right in order to improve things]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Laurel</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Rachel Nye commented on &quot;When is an affair not an affair? (Trigger warning)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/when_is_an_affa#c151663" />
<updated>2012-02-04T12:41:10Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-04T12:41:10Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151663</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[<a title="http://www.blogger.com/home" href="http://www.blogger.com/home">Rachel Nye</a> said: Well said!]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Rachel Nye</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Katrina commented on &quot;You&apos;ll catch your death in that&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/reviews/2012/02/youll_catch_you#c151662" />
<updated>2012-02-04T11:27:49Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-04T11:27:49Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151662</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/">
<![CDATA[Katrina said: Hey all, another gamer (who happens to be female here).

Thank you for this article, you touch on several points that I&apos;ve been trying to work my head around as well. The conclusions that I&apos;ve managed to come to so far run something a little like this:

I believe that a woman shouldn&apos;t be judged on what she chooses to wear, if she is wearing skimpy clothing does not mean that she &quot;wants it&quot; etc etc. I believe that the same is true in a game as well, where in some ways you can have a greater degree of control over what your character/avatar looks like than you might do in real life, for example picking a certain build and having crazy hair cuts without having to spend all that time and money maintaining it and so on. I say wear your skimpy outfit if you like, it doesn&apos;t mean that others have a right to treat you any differently. Yes, there is a problem that some people you come across will treat you differently depending on what your avatar looks like, but I think it&apos;s good to challenge them and any assumptions they might have.

For what it&apos;s worth, the transmog gear I have for my main shows considerably more flesh than anyone who intends to go fight a fire-breathing, cataclysm-casting dragon might be really comfortable with, but, like you, I like the look. And I&apos;ve not actually had any hassle as a result of it. The only comments I have had about the look is that it&apos;s &quot;very roguey&quot;, &quot;nice and understated&quot; and words to that effect. Admittedly I&apos;ve only really had any comments from my own guildies and other online friends, but if you just go out there and have confidence, I think you&apos;ll find that there&apos;s far less judgement than you might fear.

To be entirely honest, I think that I have actually had the most problems on my female orc alt. When hanging around Orgrimmar, there are certain people who seem to think it&apos;s okay to run up and tell her how &quot;ugly&quot; she is. Personally, I think she looks awesome, with her broad shoulders, muscular arms, chain mail, warhammer, spiky hair and a bad attitude. I get that not everyone will agree with me, and that&apos;s fine, we all have our own aesthetic values, but the community as a whole seems far better at accepting conventionally pretty and &quot;sexy&quot; characters.

On a sort of side note, I do think that there is a slow culture change going on in WoW as it becomes more mainstream and the gender balance becomes, well, a little less imbalanced. Historically in mmporgs a &quot;real girl&quot; was a rare thing, and more or less any female presenting character could get showered with gifts and attention. It still happens, but to a lesser degree, and I do think that there is an issue around some female players expecting, demanding and even competing with each other for this attention. There&apos;s an amusing example that I think captures the kind of thing that I mean here:

http://thenoobcomic.com/index.php?pos=209

The reason I think that this is relevant is that a lot of people online have now come across this sort of behaviour and so there is a danger that announcing that you are &quot;a girl irl&quot; will make them think that you are then expecting special treatment, extra loot etc. Obviously I don&apos;t think that this is what you are doing, but it means that letting people know that you are female is potentially going into some tricky territory. Also, I have a couple of friends online who deliberately don&apos;t let people know that they are female to avoid harassment.

I&apos;m really not sure what is the right way forward here, should we be trying to subvert terms like &quot;guys&quot; and &quot;dude&quot; to make them gender neutral? Personally I have it kind of easy, being an officer in a reasonably successful raiding guild I have perhaps greater influence on the other players directly around me. I&apos;ve asked the guild leader and other officers to remember that there are other female players, they might not all have announced themselves and when speaking to the guild (or raid) to use inclusive terms. They now do it more or less automatically, which means I think there&apos;s more of a culture of not assuming one way or another. Yeah, there&apos;s still some behaviour among guildies that I have to challenge on a semi-regular basis (not just from a feminist perspective either, there&apos;s all sorts of &quot;isms&quot; that rear their ugly heads from time to time), but I&apos;m not the only one doing the challenging, and by and large people listen and will respect me when I explain why that&apos;s not appropriate language etc. Worst case, if someone continues to be abusive and unpleasant, they can be kicked out of the guild. It may not make a big difference in the greater scheme of things, but I think it makes a better and more welcoming culture, which I certainly hope is appearing more and more around the internet.


Anyway, good luck, and I hope you get the transmog gear that *you* want ;)
]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Katrina</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>Shadow commented on &quot;When is an affair not an affair? (Trigger warning)&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2012/02/when_is_an_affa#c151661" />
<updated>2012-02-03T22:34:51Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-03T22:34:51Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151661</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/">
<![CDATA[Shadow said: There is a legal presumption that any child under the age of 13 is incapable of &apos;giving consent&apos; because they do not have the capacity or maturity to &apos;give consent.&apos;  This means rape is rape when an older male and in this case, it is Michael Yardley, subjects a child under the age of 13 to sexual activity.  Therefore according to the law Michael Yardley raped this 12 year old girl. 

It also means Yardley&apos;s defence counsel cannot make the common claim &apos;but she didn&apos;t say no therefore she must have &quot;consented&quot; to penetrative sexual activity.&apos; 

Yardley&apos;s excuse that &apos;he was unhappy in his marriage&apos; is a poor attempt at justifying his sexual predatory behaviour and as Philippa noted many men are &apos;unhappy in their marriages&apos; but these men do not commonly rape a 12 year old girl.  However, Yardley clearly believed this 12 year old female child was &apos;a disposable sexualised commodity&apos; and he enacted his pseudo male sex right of sexual ownership of her body.  

The Daily Mail&apos;s journalist Graham Smith attempted to portray Yardley as having engaged in &apos;an affair&apos; because it was essential Yardley&apos;s accountability must not be recognised as that of a male sexual predator who abused his powerful position of Police Community Officer in order to gain the trust of this female child.   

Male Supremacy commonly minimalises/excuses/justifies male sexual violence against women and girls and even more so when the male perpetrator commits sexual violence against a female child.  Males who target female children commonly portray themselves as &apos;engaging in a loving sexual relationship&apos; and commonly minimalise their accountability by claiming the female child actively encouraged him/and or the female child seduced him!   That is precisely what Graham Smith was attempting to do - to portray the female child as supposedly partially responsible, whilst minimalising/ignoring Yardley&apos;s total accountability and responsibility for his crime in raping this 12 year old girl.   No one forced Yardley to rape this child instead Yardley made the choice to commit this crime and he like so many male sexual predators, attempted to hide his culpability by manipulating the 12 year old girl and telling her that when she reaches the age of 18 they can move in together.  Most male child rapists do not use force in order to gain sexual access to the female child, instead they   gain the trust of the female child and make the child believe they love her and once the male sexual predator has gained the trust of the child then he proceeds to rape her and justifies his sexual crime either by blaming the child or else by claiming &apos;we are in love!&apos; 

Another common way male supremacy attempts to hide male accountability is by claiming the female child was &apos;sexually precocious;&apos; or she she was a &apos;nymphomaniac&apos; but commonly when female children display &apos;blatant sexual signals&apos; the reason is always because the female child has been subjected to male sexual violence and she believes this is how she is expected to behave.  
 I]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>Shadow</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
<entry> 
<title>R-Magz commented on &quot;The cultural narratives they are a-changin&apos;?&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/reviews/2012/01/Girl with the dragon tattoo#c151660" />
<updated>2012-02-03T16:36:13Z</updated>
<published>2012-02-03T16:36:13Z</published>
 <id>tag:www.thefword.org.uk,2012:/blog//2.151660</id>
 <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thefword.org.uk/">
<![CDATA[R-Magz said: Agree completely with Shaype and Claudia&apos;s comments, haven&apos;t seen the film but from reading the books I feel they are quite flawed....I&apos;m no feminist scholar but I feel that, even though Larsson was exceptional for even addressing the issue of sexual and state violence against women, I think he still had a tendency to try and &apos;sex up&apos; his writing so that a male audience would be interested. Salander is such a collection of titillating bad-girl clichés she is hard to take sometimes. Tough women have existed in cinema for years, and have been more believable by far. 

However, in terms of calling out on state abuse and taking control, Larsson&apos;s creation is great progress, but reality is sadly far behind - the fate of his partner highlights how things really are in the real world. Strong women are those who stand up and fight for their rights and those of their fellow women. And they don&apos;t have to be tattooed, motorbike riding, bisexual computer hackers to do it.]]>
    </content>
<author>
<name>R-Magz</name>
</author>
 
</entry>
</feed> 
