Last round-up of the year?

// 29 December 2008

The Washington Post reports on female genital mutilation among Iraq’s Kurdish population. This one is brutal, be warned – particularly the photos. Via Jezebel

Shark-fu has a must-read post, over at Shakesville:

The first time I was gay bashed I was seventeen. I was in college and walking to the T in Boston with a girl friend. We had gone to a club and were returning to campus…we held hands, even though we weren’t a couple…and, as we rounded a corner to approach the T station a group of men came towards us down the sidewalk.

Researchers at San Francisco State University have found that, unsurprisingly, LGB teenagers rejected by their families are more likely to suffer from mental health problems, reports Pink News:

The study found that LGB young people who had experienced higher levels of rejection from their family were 8.4 times more likely to attempt suicide, and almost 6 times more likely to become depressed, than young people who experienced no rejection from their families.

Rejected LGB teenagers were also found to be 3.4 times more likely to use drugs and 3.4 times more likely to engage in unprotected sex than other young people.

The reason that men do better than women at competitive chess is because more men play chess, reports Scientific American. Via Jezebel again.

Just why is the media obsessed with Colonel Gaddafi’s female bodyguards? Yusra at Muslimah Media Watch says:

As a Libyan woman, aware of how other Libyan women view the bodyguards, I can assure you, they are by no means the archetype of liberty or the crusaders of women’s rights. I for one do not define liberal values as trailing in the footsteps of a dictator.

Over at AlterNet, Dean Baker says that two financial regulators in the US stand out as “doing the right thing” – Brooksley Born, former chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Sheila Bair, chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Cooperation:

Basically, the women who enter the financial world have not been fully integrated into the club. They are still outsiders. Therefore, they are more likely to blow the whistle on the sweet deals that can make hundreds of millions for the boys, while leaving the rest of us out in the cold.

Time Magazine thinks it’s time for Michelle and Barack Obama to have a boy – Renee at Womanist Musings has more:

How can the US compete on the global stage if the men that they elects do not produce male heirs? Can we say overvaluation of masculinity? The American people, supposedly exist with a unique state of evolvement because unlike other nation states they have the courage to elect leaders who have not produced male progeny.

Time however, does not hesitate to suggest that Michelle should throw out her birth control and take one for the team. Since she has already given up a high powered career, why wouldn’t she want to get pregnant; God did after all give her the ovaries. Why else do women exist if not to take one for the team.

Nezua at The Unapologetic Mexican started vlogging.

The Art of Manliness blog ran a competition for ‘Man of the Year’, to celebrate “men who epitomize the manliness that used to exist before the arrival of metrosexual pretty boys”. Look who won.

Was the Wallace & Gromit Christmas special sexist?

And Sociological Images wonders if these ads are criticising the way women’s bodies are used to sell products, or sending up the idea that it’s a valid criticism.

Comments From You

JENNIFER DREW // Posted 30 December 2008 at 1:41 pm

Most of the articles/news reports concerned enforcing gendered binaries. Why else were winners of ‘Man of the Year’ those males who emulated traditional narrow masculinities. Likewise genital mutilation is all about maintaining women’s sexual subordination to men.

Wallace and Gromit was not only sexist it was also blatantly misogynstic. Ah but misogyny is so ‘hip’ now it is no longer about women-hating stereotypical representations – it is all about ‘irony.’ Odd because on the oh so rare occasions men as a group are criticised immediately we read/hear cries of man-hating feminists etc. etc.

No sociological Images these advertisements were not challenging sexual commodification of women because a man’s head had been superimposed on a woman’s body. Advertising company was cleverly acknowledging sexual exploitation of female bodies happens but hey, it also happens to men too! So, two individual advertisements supposedly challenge commonplace female sexual exploitation do they? Hardly, rather advertising company was deliberately ridiculing claims advertisers almost always use female sexualised body parts to sell anything and everything.

Laurel Dearing // Posted 30 December 2008 at 1:55 pm

the lost art of being a man? i didnt realise they had to try, never mind make it n art. books on how to be a gentleman and how to be manly. lets try being ourselves

S // Posted 31 December 2008 at 2:24 pm

I’m not so sure about Wallace and Grommit but I’ll admit that this could be just because I liked it.

The reason she was out to kill bakers (I felt) was because she was sacked for being too fat.

She never said (according to my memory, which I’ll be the first to admit, Isn’t the one you want to check with) that she disliked her weight. She wasn’t doing much to change it, if she was so against it.

She seemed more annoyed that she’d been kicked off because of it, something that many people have said to be a serious problem.

And doesn’t the villian always get some form of terrible comeuppance in W &G? Is hers really that different to previous villians?

But this could just be me using rose tinted glasses.

Lindsey // Posted 5 January 2009 at 3:56 pm

Also Wallace and Gromit would have been completely lost if it wasn’t for the female poodle…

Virago // Posted 8 January 2009 at 4:09 pm

TBH I saw it more as a nod to classic horror / B movies rather than misogynist. After all the counterpoint to the ‘cereal’ killer was her Poodle: industrious, as smart as Gromit and lovable. I’ve never seen any hint of misogyny in W&G before and I don’t see it now.

After all in Curse of the Wererabbit the bad guy was male, and in Wrong Trousers/Close Shave/Grand Day Out the ‘baddies’ were a penguin, robot and old cooker respectively, none of which were obviously gendered.

Just because a woman is the ‘baddie’ that does not automatically make the programme/book/film/whatever sexist or misogynist. We’re equal to all genders – thus equally able to be good or bad.

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds