Baroness Warsi is no symbol of Tory progress

// 28 February 2010

For the uninitiated, today is the last day of LGBT month; a time of the year for celebrating, highlighting and reflecting upon issues affecting the LGBT community. Ironically, this coincides with a profile in today’s Independent newspaper of Baroness Warsi and her unique position within the Conservative party. As the first Muslim member of the Cabinet or Shadow Cabinet, British-Asian and Yorkshire born Warsi is being heralded as symbolic of Cameron’s new ‘classless’ party. Warsi is as far away from the stereotypical, blue-blooded Tories of yore and her place in the party is a major coup in terms of representation and diversity.

Harold Wilson’s statement that “A week is a long time in politics” could not be more poignant, however. Have we become so stirred up with post-election fervour that we have forgotten the delights of Ms Warsi’s 2005 election campaign literature, as per the Guardian’s 2005 article?

“Labour has scrapped section 28 which was introduced by the Conservatives to stop schools promoting alternative sexual lifestyles such as homosexuality to children as young as seven years old… now schools are allowed and do promote homosexuality and other alternative sexual lifestyles to your children.”

“Labour reduced the age of consent for homosexuality from 18 to 16 allowing school children to be propositioned for homosexual relationships.”

“I will campaign strongly for an end to sex education at seven years and the promotion of homosexuality that undermines family life.”

In addition to the sensationalist and wildly problematic content of the literature, Warsi went further by allegedly distributing the aforementioned material to the Muslim community in the district, whilst campaign literature circulated to the white community allegedly focused on issues of immigration. In an interview in The Times newspaper of February 2008, she insisted that her campaign was “not about homosexuality” but “sex education generally”.

A non-male figure with authority and visibility in a major political party is usually ample cause for celebration, party politics aside. A British-Asian Muslim woman in a politically powerful position is reason enough for a full-blown fiesta, in my opinion. Representation is essential in any democratic society. For me, political parties wishing to attain any semblance of credibility and authenticity need to ensure that the make-up of their candidates is reflective of wider society.

Despite David’s impassioned polemics, Attitude front cover and protestations that they’re now “the party for change”, while they continue to wheel out Warsi as a symbol of their progress, the Conservatives will never convince me that their party is a group concerned with equality for all.

Comments From You

Kristin // Posted 1 March 2010 at 12:13 pm

The Conservatives are not the party for change – they are the party who will NEVER change. They formed to protect the interests of the land owning rich and privileged, and that will always be their agenda. 95% of the land in Britain is still privately owned.

I have many criticisms of Labour, with whom I am disgusted and incandescently disappointed. But if the Conservatives had always been in power there would be no health service, sex education would not even be an issue because it would be unthinkable (and obviously still is to many Conservatives) and most women of the non-rich & privileged classes would have no career decision to make except for what kind of domestic servant they wanted to be. Or if they had managed to get some education they could of course become a governess. Woo-hoo.

Shea // Posted 1 March 2010 at 12:39 pm

So very true.

I found it quite ironic that despite her very good performance on BBC Question time against Nick Griffin, many of the tory immigration policies have an awful lot in common with the BNP.

Her attitude on homosexuality just demonstrates that there is nothing “progressive” about the Conservative party.

Elmo // Posted 1 March 2010 at 2:20 pm

is she the one who was on question time when the BNP were on?

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds