Govt policy set to undermine women’s political power? New report

// 28 July 2011

Tags: , , ,

woman symbol stones.jpg

The Centre for Women & Democracy has published a new report examining the impact of the government’s reform agenda on women’s political power in the UK.

The report examines ten pieces of legislation that were either recently enacted or are currently travelling through the parliamentary process to assess how they will affect women’s representation in public policy-making, decision-making and scrutiny roles.

Its findings should be cause for some concern.

According to the report, women are set to “disappear” from a number of key areas including economic strategy, policing and health care.

The report does confirm that that women’s representation is likely to improve in some areas under the proposed reforms, but cautions that these gains will be outstripped by greater under-representation in other areas. Under current plans, the report predicts that there will be more women school governors and peers, and fewer women executive mayors, police commissioners and chairs of Local Enterprise Partnerships.

The report includes recommendations for turning things around and ensuring women’s representation is not the cost of upcoming government reforms. They cover the following pieces of legislation:

  • Academies Act and the Education Bill
  • Fixed Term Parliaments Bill
  • Health & Social Care Bill
  • House of Lords Reform Draft Bill
  • Local Growth White Paper
  • Localism Bill
  • Police & Social Responsibility Bill
  • Public Bodies Bill
  • Parliamentary Voting System & Constituencies Act

Many of the recommendations are uncontroversial and rather basic – such as carrying out Equality Impact Assessments (many of the above have not yet had one). Others are more challenging though no less necessary, such as requiring that women make up 50 percent of the bishops appointed to a reformed House of Lords (accepting that for some, a reformed House should not have any bishops). In the words of the report:

the real controversy is that we still seem to live in a system which regards women as an optional extra to public decision-making and scrutiny processes and fails to notice when the cumulative impact of change is to exclude them.

You can read the full report here or the executive summary here.

Photo of the woman symbol made out of stones, by rotkraut.c.r, shared under a Creative Commons licence

Comments From You

sian norris // Posted 28 July 2011 at 4:30 pm

‘we still seem to live in a system which regards women as an optional extra to public decision-making and scrutiny processes and fails to notice when the cumulative impact of change is to exclude them.’

Yep. pretty much sums it up.

Coupled with the macho, sexist posturings in the house of commons seeming to get worse, i would not at all be surprised if representation of women in parliament dropped in 2015.

Evan // Posted 29 July 2011 at 7:04 pm

How can this possibly improve when the government has created the most unequal gender policy imaginable where, after the birth of a child, women stay home for a year but men for only 2 weeks. So, which of them is going to advance professionally and be better in position and motivated to aspire to political office? This strangles the pipeline of female candidates. Without 50% female candidates, how will there ever be 50% female elected officials?

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds