Fawcett response to Chancellor’s autumn financial statement

// 29 November 2011

Tags: ,

fawcett society logo

From Anna Bird, Acting Chief Executive of the Fawcett Society:

Today’s policy announcements have made an already bad situation worse. Capping public sector pay will impact disproportionately on women who make up the bulk of the public sector workforce: this real terms decrease in take home pay will see millions of women who are already struggling to make ends meet trying to survive on tighter budgets than ever.

Freezing all but one element of the Working Tax Credit and rowing back on the increase to the child element will hit women hard, when they are already coping with the ten per cent cut in the childcare element of the credit since April . In particular, lone parents – the vast majority of whom are women – will be hit particularly hard by this move as: 36 per cent of all single parents are WTC claimants, compared to just 15 per cent of couples with children.

Plans to increase free childcare access for low earners are welcome, but it’s not clear how much effect this will have when considered against other policies that are making working life harder for parents – last year’s budget cut the childcare element of the WTC.

Today’s statement must be considered against a worsening picture for women’s employment generally – it’s already at a record 23 year high, and the Office of Budget Responsibility is now forecasting more than 700 000 jobs will go from the public sector by 2017. It’s highly likely the majority of these job cuts will come from women – they make up two thirds of the public sector workforce, and have borne the brunt of public sector jobs losses so far.

The government’s overall approach to reducing the deficit risks turning back time on women’s equality. The government urgently needs to take steps to address the attack on women’s financial security and so wider equality. Next year’s budget must include measures – such as those contained in our Life Raft for Women’s Equality – to stop any further roll back on women’s equality.”

Comments From You

Clodia // Posted 30 November 2011 at 4:23 pm

Quite right. There seems to be an element in this country that would like to see women deprived of their right to work, and whether or not this is unconscious, this government is deliberately targeting the income of women who make up the majority of public sector employees and are still generally paid less than men and end up with poorer pensions, certainly not “gold plated”. Women taking part in strikes appear to be targeted by some of the media in trying to engender a “public v private sector” conflict. Fact is that the majority of bankers etc are men, the majority of lower paid workers are women. Even women who make it to the top of their profession in the public sector ( and I was one) frequently, even in 2011, hit a glass ceiling in pay and promotion opportunities, and are more easily targeted when times are tough.

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds