Are you a neighbour from hell? You might be surprised.

// 25 February 2012

Tags: , ,

A photograph of an Evening Press newspaper headline in a stand, reading Most of us have had a neighbour from hell at some point in our lives. It tends to involve loud music late at night, harassment, dogs barking non-stop or turning a shared garden into a junkyard. We certainly know one when we see (or hear) one, and house moves can be filled with anxiety about what the new neighbours will be like.

In December, David Cameron made a speech about troubled families. He said,

Officialdom might call them ‘families with multiple disadvantages’.

Some in the press might call them ‘neighbours from hell’.

Whatever you call them, we’ve known for years that a relatively small number of families are the source of a large proportion of the problems in society.


Last year the state spent an estimated £9 billion on just 120,000 families

“We’ve known for years” is quite a poor replacement for evidence (a bit like “it’s common sense”), and personally I doubt that a small number of problems are responsible for the kinds of problems in society that I see. We need to look higher up than that.

Cameron goes on to describe how expensive these ‘problem families’ are to society, with examples like a family visiting A&E “for things like self-harm”.

Jonathan Portes did some digging, to work out exactly where the PM’s figures had come from. Just who are these ‘problem families’ and ‘neighbours from hell’, who are so expensive, and “are responsible for the […] problems in society”?

It turns out that they are from the Department for Communities and Local Government. Jonathan found their definition was:

a family which satisfies at least 5 of the following 7 criteria:

a) no parent in work

b) poor quality housing,

c) no parent with qualifications,

d) mother with mental health problems

e) one parent with longstanding disability/illness

f) family has low income,

g) Family cannot afford some food/clothing items

So a woman with an anxiety disorder, who is a parent, who has no qualifications, and is therefore out of work and has a low income, so can not afford all the clothes and food they might need, is a “neighbour from hell”. A disabled man for whom the extra costs of disability mean that the family also struggles for money, he can’t work because workplaces are inaccessible, and he went to a “special school” which didn’t offer its pupils the chance to do GCSEs, and who is in poor quality housing because it was the only accessible property they could find? Also a “neighbour from hell”? Responsible for problems in society?

No. If anything, these people are having the problems in society plonked right on their heads and are fighting for air. The problems in society may well have caused them to be living in the circumstances they find themselves in.

In other words, the “troubled families” in the Prime Minister’s speech are not necessarily “neighbours from hell” at all. They are poor.

I’ve had neighbours from hell. They are not these people.

(Extra irony points for this gem,

Take the work of Emma Harrison, who has given us all inspiration in the last 12 months.

She has shown that high aspirations for families is important – and that we shouldn’t write them off as unreachable or un-teachable.

She has real ambition for these families and I know we can count on her to help drive this campaign forward in the future with us.

Yes, the same Emma Harrison who has resigned after allegations of fraudulent use of Government money. Family champion, or neighbour from hell, Cameron?)

[The image is a photograph of an Evening Press newspaper headline in a stand, reading “York hell neighbour says sorry”. It was taken by hugovk and is used under a Creative Commons Licence]

Comments From You

Lisa Egan // Posted 25 February 2012 at 3:57 pm

According to that checklist, I grew up in a “problem” family.

Everyone is our village would probably have agreed that we were somehow wrong; as a whole family of cripples being a blemish on the nice, middle to upper middle class, Tory village.

I think the only non-white family in the village escaped such judgements because at least they weren’t poor.

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds