Argentina’s Senate passes gender identity law

// 10 May 2012

Tags: , ,

Transgender symbol against a background of the Argentinian flag

Via Mauro Cabral, Co-Director of the Argentinian branch of GATE (Global Action for Trans* Equality) I learn that the country’s Senate yesterday (9 May 2012) unanimously approved a gender identity law that doesn’t require a medical diagnosis in order to gain legal recognition, hormonal treatment and/or surgical procedures (including hormones and surgeries carried out in the public health system) and that doesn’t require medical intervention as a condition of legal recognition.

As Mauro says:

It’s a law grounded in the right to identity, establishing informed consent as the best practice for trans* access to health.

It seems likely there will be a short delay for the legislation to be formally enacted by Presidente Cristina Fernández before it actually becomes law, but it’s hoped that it will be practically implemented soon after that.

The significance of this change cannot be understated – the linking of trans* people’s medical and legal statuses is an area of trans* rights which has long been believed to cause more problems for many trans* people than it solves, both in accessing healthcare and obtaining legal recognition, and it is to be hoped that other countries will follow Argentina’s example in supporting trans* people’s rights.

More at the Spanish language website Minutouno


Image compiled from public domain images in Wikimedia Commons (here and here) by Helen

Comments From You

Laura // Posted 10 May 2012 at 11:21 am


SexierThanThou // Posted 10 May 2012 at 3:40 pm

So, what up with all the asterisks, yo?

Helen G // Posted 10 May 2012 at 4:04 pm

Some people feel that ‘trans*’ is a more inclusive term than ‘trans’.

‘Trans*’ is often understood to cover a range of gender expressions (eg. transgender, transsexual, genderqueer, non-binary, genderfluid, third gender, cross-dresser, bi-gender, trans man, trans woman, agender and so on), whereas ‘trans’ could be taken to apply only to trans men and trans women.

But the language around trans* issues is continually evolving and my attempt at an explanation shouldn’t be taken as definitive. It’s just my own take on it; I don’t claim to speak for anyone else and you may well find others whose definition is completely different to mine!

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds