Did the Tokyo Conference deliver for Afghan Women?

// 10 July 2012

Tags: , , , ,

Tokyo Conference Afghanistan.jpg

Trigger Warning.

The same day that delegates from over 70 countries convened in Tokyo to discuss future aid to Afghanistan, Reuters released footage (trigger warning) of an unnamed 22 year old woman being publicly murdered for ‘adultery’ by a man believed to be a member of the Taliban. A cruel reminder, yet again, of how precarious any advances on women’s rights in the country since 2001 are.

Without this footage, Sunday’s meeting in Tokyo might have been considered a relative success. There was a welcome increased focus on women’s rights, compared to previous international meetings on Afghanistan for example: the official declaration (pdf) from the conference is peppered with references to women’s human rights and to their constitutional rights to equality with men. The declaration even – and significantly – confirms that tackling violence against women is a priority for the international community via a specific indicator on the implementation of both the 2009 law on the Elimination of Violence Against Women and the National Action Plan on Women in Afghanistan. This is a key advance, and something ActionAid has been pushing for.

Yet, specific commitments on how this would be achieved are non-existent and there was apparently no clear budget allocated for tackling violence against women and girls or promoting women’s rights. As the footage makes all too apparent, lofty statements that are not coupled with dedicated funds, transparency and clarity about how implementation will happen, and some indications of how failure to implement will be handled, are of relatively limited use to the women and girls of Afghanistan that are daily facing threats to their rights and lives.

As mentioned in my previous post on this, ActionAid has calculated that just US$90m is needed to begin to tackle violence against women in Afghanistan – a drop in the ocean in the grand scheme of things. We will be following up with the UK Government to find out how much of its committed funding to Afghanistan will be directly focused on eliminating violence against women, and continuing to push the international community to similarly address gender-based violence against women and girls.

But Sunday’s footage tells us something Afghan women’s rights activists like those from the Afghan Women’s Network are all too aware of (pdf of their Tokyo Conference demands): that a radical change in approach is needed to address the real challenges in the country. Laws and policies on women’s rights are systematically not being implemented, violence against women is rampant, and pressure is mounting as we move closer to the 2014 troop withdrawal deadline. Moreover, the murder occurred just one hour outside of the capital, proving not only that the Taliban’s influence is not limited to remote areas of the country where NATO forces do not have a strong presence, but also that its influence remains set against women.

Evidently, a rethink on the security and development agendas in the country is desperately and urgently needed. Violence against women and girls is not a marginal issue. The murder demonstrates why ‘peace’ negotiations with the Taliban that do not include women in the conversations are so deeply problematic and must be stopped. There can be no peace where fifty percent of the population is not able to exercise voice or influence at the decision-making table, especially when those at the table have not proved they will uphold women’s rights. As the campaign on Afghan women’s rights says, No women, No peace.

You can take action about the murder by signing this campaign petition.

Image of participants at the Tokyo Conference, by Chris Kiggell/DFID – UK Department for International Development, shared under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. Caption on original photo read: Tokyo Conference on Afghanistan gets underway. Tokyo, 8 July 2012: International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell talks to US Secretary of State for International Development Hillary Clinton as President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon prepare to open proceedings at the Tokyo Conference on Afghanistan.

Comments From You

Tash // Posted 11 July 2012 at 12:47 am

This was obviously a horrible thing that happened,and I grieve for this woman, and other women suffering and being unsupported. I don’t really have much to say about this event, except I really wish it wasn’t like this, and I intend to find out who in government here is responsible for the allocation of aid and write a letter, because I can’t think of anything else to do.

The main reason I decided to comment though was your use of the words ‘Trigger warning’ alone at the top of this article. I find the use of trigger warnings or content notes to be a fantastic idea for authors to give readers notice about the content they’re about to engage in, and I’m grateful that you attempted to do so. I think, however, that simply saying ‘trigger warning’ is ineffective to achieve the goals generally associated with these statements. What is it a trigger warning for? Suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, violence, sexual violence, representations of people who are deceased… All of these and more are often indicated by a trigger warning or comparable content notice. I have no way of knowing, from the title of the post and the words ‘trigger warning’ alone, which of these subjects may come up in this post.

Perhaps in the future, to better achieve the goal of supporting those people who may be disturbed or triggered by such things, you could include a vague descriptor as well. E.g. ‘Trigger warning: violence against women,’ or ‘Content note: names and images of deceased persons.’

sian norris // Posted 11 July 2012 at 9:20 am

$90 million really isn’t much is it? and it could do so much to create real change. we can’t have peace, we can’t have stability and prosperity when women are not included, when women are held hostage. VAWG has to be a priority. I’m glad that it’s being talked about, but like you say, we need to see dedicated commitment – and money – to ensure change happens.

zohra moosa // Posted 11 July 2012 at 9:55 am

Hi Tash

Maybe you could write to your MP, so they know that one of their constituents is worried about this issue? And if you receive any reply, it would be great if you could let us know by posting back on the blog.

Thanks for the feedback re the trigger warning lable. I tend to use it and read it as referring to any kind of violence, and don’t particularly enjoy the descriptions of what kind I might be subject to. But I take your point that more detail could help some people make more informed decisions about whether to read on or click or whatever (especially for those issues that might not be defined as violence by some people, but which might be triggering). I’ll take it back to the bloggers collective so we can discuss how to make better use of the label.

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds