Diversity in Parliament: time for gender quotas?

// 17 June 2017

Tags: , , , ,

This is a guest blog by Jackie Thomas. She is a feminist, a Francophile and lectures at university. She loves the analysis of painting and film, and has never been a supporter of referendums

Whatever the newspaper you have been reading this week, they have almost all run the same headlines: ‘Britain makes history! A record number of female MPs win seats in 2017 General Election’.

Let’s be clear on the figures – believe me they are nothing to boast about. Of the MPs elected into Parliament last week, only 208 were women. While this is a very welcome 6% increase on 196 in 2015, it represents a mere 32% of our MPs overall. An increase the Fawcett Society claims is totally inadequate and actually indicates that progress has stalled compared with previous years.

According to the London School of Economics and Political Science, the UK would now rank 39th in the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s global league table of parliamentary representation. This puts us behind many of our European neighbours, African and Latin American states. And this despite having jumped after the 2015 election from 58th place into 36th.

With women representing 61% of its MPs (lower or single house), Rwanda heads the list of the top 10 countries that have used gender quotas to achieve a more balanced Parliament. And more recently in France, President Emmanuel Macron submitted his gender equal list of candidates for the parliamentary elections before announcing his 50/50 senior cabinet, and is poised to seek equal representation in the French government. Bulgaria, Nicaragua, Canada and Sweden have also broken through the 50% threshold of women MPs.

However, the stagnation in numbers of female MPs has not been reserved to the UK. This is a worldwide trend which puts us in danger of failing to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals set out in 2015 by world leaders.

Given the need to pick up the pace, should the UK be rethinking its position in the debate on gender quotas?

Countries with more balanced parliamentary representatives are distinguished from the UK by their use of legislated quotas for women. While there has been a lot of discussion in this country focusing on meritocracy and party politics, the decision to implement quotas has never been adopted across parties. Some parties are much more in need of women than others. The recent election saw 45% of Labour seats being won by women and the SNP, despite losing seats, increased their proportion of female MPs by one percentage point to 34%. The Conservatives were at a standstill at 21%.

The Women and Equalities Committee strongly recommended in January that penalties should be imposed on parties who fail to guarantee that at least 45% of their candidates are women as of 2020. Despite this, the UK government has not only failed to come up with any legislative change in time for this month’s election, but has also showed a serious lack of commitment to do so anytime soon. And sadly the momentum gained in 2015 to crack the political glass ceiling has fallen foul once again of our propensity to exaggerate our achievements.

In this unstable political climate we are sure to see gender equality pushed even further to bottom of the agenda in favour of what our political parties consider to be more pressing issues. Yet days before the Brexit negotiations are due to begin is not a time to be complacent about the remarkable contribution of the EU to gender equality and what this has meant for British women in terms of equal pay, employment rights and protection against discrimination.

All of this should also be examined in the context of the shameful treatment suffered by female MPs throughout the election period. The defeat last week of the candidates representing the Women’s Equality Party after weeks of abuse and death threats, and the vicious and prolonged attacks on MP Diane Abbott, speak volumes.

We desperately need to acknowledge the many barriers women face to entering political office, including the media scrutiny of MPs and their families, the masculine culture of Parliament, the lack of flexibility and support for those with primary caring responsibilities, the cost and time demands of being a candidate, potentially biased selection processes, and not enough encouragement of women into politics.

Many of these factors also come into play for ethnic minorities and disabled people who, although elected into Parliament in record numbers this year, remain woefully underrepresented given the diversity of the UK.

The combination of these challenges result in a wholly unequal playing field, which means that talent and hard work are not guarantees of success. Introducing gender quotas is the only way to get us where we need to be – to a place where Parliament is representative of the country it serves.

Image courtesy UK Parliament on Flickr

Image depicts the House of Commons Chamber

Editor’s note (17/06/2017): Some details in this post have been corrected in line with Megan’s comments below it

Comments From You

Megan Stodel // Posted 17 June 2017 at 4:05 pm

I agree there are huge barriers to women entering politics, and think quotas should not be ruled out necessarily, though there are different ways of approaching these.

However, this post contains several errors that are unhelpful.

It’s a 6% increase in the number of MPs that are women, not a 2% increase. However, there’s a 2 percentage point increase in the proportion of MPs that are women. There are other places where the difference between a percentage change and a percentage point change are mixed up.

“With women representing 64% of its MPs, Rwanda heads the list of the top 10 countries that have used gender quotas to achieve a more balanced Parliament.” – According to the IPU’s table linked in the previous paragraph, they are at 61%, in their lower house at least (their upper house has 39%).

“Bulgaria, Nicaragua, Canada and Sweden have also broken through the 50% threshold of women MPs.” – Also according to the IPU’s table, none of these countries have 50% women MPs. I assume this is actually to do with women in the cabinet or equivalent, although I just checked Bulgaria and it looks like their cabinet has 5/21 members who are women. So not sure what this is referring to. Maybe it means have ever broken through this threshold, in the cabinet? Still not sure if that is true of Bulgaria.

jrt // Posted 18 June 2017 at 9:44 am

The figure of 2% reported suggests that the numbers of women MPs in 2015 and those in 2017 have stagnated in line with the worldwide trend.The figure today in the UK of 208 women MPs constitutes 32% of all MPs while the figure in 2015 of 196 constituted 30%.

Between 2013 and 2016 Rwanda has headed the list of those countries with gender quotas in place with 64% of its MPs. While this figure has dropped to 61.3% in 2017 it is significant that Rwanda maintained the figure of 64% over a three year period.

According to the IPU report and press release on 15 March 2017 all countries referred to above have exceeded 50% of women in ministerial positions. The press release reported Bulgaria to have seen women’s representation rise to 52.9 per cent from 17.6 per cent in 2010. However recent elections in Bulgaria have seen a drop and in 2017 this is significant under the new coalition.

Have Your say

To comment, you must be registered with The F-Word. Not a member? Register. Already a member? Use the sign in button below

Sign in to the F-Word

Further Reading

Has The F-Word whet your appetite? Check out our Resources section, for listings of feminist blogs, campaigns, feminist networks in the UK, mailing lists, international and national websites and charities of interest.

Write for us!

Got something to say? Something to review? News to discuss? Well we want to hear from you! Click here for more info

  • The F-Word on Twitter
  • The F-Word on Facebook
  • Our XML Feeds